Live data from Hacker News

Untitled topic

news.ycombinator.com

41–50 of 259 posts

Re: undefined

#41

Mixed feelings about him honestly. I still can't forget how he betrayed Wozniak.

Or how he taunted Alvy Ray Smith because of his Southern accent. Or how his example continues to be used to excuse bad behavior today ("but Steve Jobs did it that way").

He occasionally did that to Tim Cook as well.

Re: undefined

#42

This thread reminds me of the last Steve Jobs related thread. So many people bashing Jobs based on stories they’ve read having never met him and knowing little about him. People seem to think they even know his private medical history based on only public reports. So much judgement and criticism and it feels completely unnecessary. It’s the kind of pointless outrage type comments we tend not to find very often on HN,…

Sometimes people (me included) can't separate the person from their creations/actions.

I'm not saying they always should, but is just an observation.

I think is fair to say that Jobs changed several industries and that has a lot of value to me, but there are plenty of documented situations when I was left thinking he was not a good person.

I don't need to know him to learn from all those documented facts.

Re: undefined

#43
post #23

I think that Apple suffers from not having that person at the top with taste who was willing to say “this is shit”. The overall software quality has dropped markedly at Apple and the hardware more uneven since he left. There were misses under Steve like the Cube where there wasn’t a market. But the product was great. Now there is a market but the product is middling like the Watch. Yes the watch was started when he w…

This is apparently not cool these days. I think we’ve lost our spirit of what made SV great. Now it’s just identity politics, pessimism and general stagnancy as Peter Thiel puts it. I honestly kind of want to go back to 2005 - what a time to be alive.

Re: undefined

#44
post #33
post #9

I think Apple would be an even more interesting company if he were still around. Maybe not as big or as profitable, but certainly more interesting. I wish he hadn't been so strongheaded about herbal remedies and whatnot. He had the more curable kind of cancer, had he taken it seriously earlier. As someone who has lost family to pancreatic cancer, it really upset me to learn that he didn't use his vast resources to do…

> I think Apple would be an even more interesting company if he were still around There is no way Jobs would have been at the helm of Apple, even if he was still alive. He'd have been canceled, matter of fact he'd have been one of the first people to get canceled given that he'd be occupying a spot wanted by basically everybody, plus he had made so many enemies....and finally let's not dabble around it: guy had so ma…

Interesting idea. But Musk and Bezos are still in charge…

Re: undefined

#45

I've thought a lot about his legacy lately with the permanently on-going horror story that is Facebook and Mark Zuckerburg. For all of Steve's flaws, from an outside observer like myself, it seems that his intentions/desires/goals for Apple, Pixar, NeXT were mostly, or at least equally, fueled by genuinely wanting to improve the lives of humans. Among the rarified air of modern radical world-changing billionaire CEO'…

Musk (and his PR machine) leans into his mostly manufactured image as an eccentric genius, which charms an audience who is susceptible to that type of thing.

Bezos has had no significant public profile to speak of except as a brutal, unrelenting capitalist. He's clearly trying to change that with his post-Amazon charm tour in space.

Re: undefined

#46

This thread reminds me of the last Steve Jobs related thread. So many people bashing Jobs based on stories they’ve read having never met him and knowing little about him. People seem to think they even know his private medical history based on only public reports. So much judgement and criticism and it feels completely unnecessary. It’s the kind of pointless outrage type comments we tend not to find very often on HN,…

I'm incredibly thankful for Jobs introducing the personal computer. Computers are devices that we can own and use, not intangible and unreachable academic things. We owe our careers in part to him and his work.

At the same time, I'm profoundly upset at his introduction of the App Store and sidelining of the right to repair. Our devices belong to us. We should be able to do with them what we please.

It's also incredibly anti-competitive to tell every startup in the world that what was once free to distribute, market, and form a relationship with their customer: "now you must sit atop Apple rails for (entirely artificial) reasons". It's extractive. There's so much more to solve in the world. Why take energy from those smaller than you? It lowered the fitness and innovation capacity of everyone else. Those dollars could be runway and additional labor for someone with bright ideas.

Jobs was a human just like the rest of us. There was both good and bad in him, and he made a profound mark upon society. The world was shaped by his short time here. No question.

Re: undefined

#47
I cant help but think Apple is using Steve to tell us what Apple really is. Since Tim Cook has failed to communicate that message across to its audience. ( May be apart from certain ideology group ).

It may also help to temper the new born hatred against Apple from their long time supporters.

I really wish he was still alive, and continue to be the yard stick of quality so we dont have Apple Music, spending two years on the next song and then another two years reversing that. [1], Apple TV+, as Steve would have partnered with Disney. A whole generation of MacBook with Butterfly Keyboard. Apple without an Editor is like a Giant Design Studio, everything looks great, from UI to Industrial Design. But they are more forms over function.

[1] https://youtu.be/B9Ve-mEy1oY?t=260

Re: undefined

#48
post #9

I think Apple would be an even more interesting company if he were still around. Maybe not as big or as profitable, but certainly more interesting. I wish he hadn't been so strongheaded about herbal remedies and whatnot. He had the more curable kind of cancer, had he taken it seriously earlier. As someone who has lost family to pancreatic cancer, it really upset me to learn that he didn't use his vast resources to do…

I think he did quite a bit out of the ordinary, according to reports like this (1): > "Through a legal, little-known practice called multiple listing, Jobs doubled his odds by getting on waiting lists in California and Tennessee. Competition was too stiff back home in California, and Jobs, his wealth and fame notwithstanding, may have died waiting. But in mere weeks he jumped to the top of the list in Memphis, ahead…

Tim Cook is the one responsible for their overseas manufacturing. Him successfully pulling it off is the reason he became CEO.

Re: undefined

#49
post #9

I think Apple would be an even more interesting company if he were still around. Maybe not as big or as profitable, but certainly more interesting. I wish he hadn't been so strongheaded about herbal remedies and whatnot. He had the more curable kind of cancer, had he taken it seriously earlier. As someone who has lost family to pancreatic cancer, it really upset me to learn that he didn't use his vast resources to do…

At the very least, it would have been a lot more interesting to see Steve Jobs in those Senate hearings.

Re: undefined

#50
post #47

I cant help but think Apple is using Steve to tell us what Apple really is. Since Tim Cook has failed to communicate that message across to its audience. ( May be apart from certain ideology group ). It may also help to temper the new born hatred against Apple from their long time supporters. I really wish he was still alive, and continue to be the yard stick of quality so we dont have Apple Music, spending two years…

Steve would never have let them make phones with those enormous camera bumps.
Post reply on HN