Earlier quoted context omitted.
> unlockable bootloaders so the users can load whatever they want Here you go: https://puri.sm/products/librem-5 .
We shouldn't have to sacrifice performance, quality, and reasonable price points in order to have the basic things we've had in the desktop world for decades.
S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
41–50 of 99 posts
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#42From what I can understand, AFA meant that a manufacturer could lose their license to Google Play Services on _all_ of their devices if they produced _any_ devices using an Android fork. This is a clear abuse of market power.
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#43Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#44I hate when a law or legal decision is aimed 45 degrees off like this. Letting manufacturers bundle their fucked-up version of Android is a bad thing. What we need is mandatory unlockable bootloaders so the users can load whatever they want on their devices.
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#45I recently installed LineageOS on my phone, replacing the stock MIUI. I would probably return this phone if I had no other option than to use MIUI. I much prefer the "pure" Android experience. For many essential and security critical apps to work, like bank apps or the McDonald's app you need to hide the fact you're using a modified system, because of SafetyNet. This hiding/bypass works for now, because it tricks Goo…
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#46Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#47Will they also fine Samsung for blocking the user's right to remove manufacturer-bundled cruftware?
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
> unlockable bootloaders so the users can load whatever they want Here you go: https://puri.sm/products/librem-5 .
Give me a Librem 5 with an SoC that isn't hot garbage and I'd buy it immediately.
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#49I recently installed LineageOS on my phone, replacing the stock MIUI. I would probably return this phone if I had no other option than to use MIUI. I much prefer the "pure" Android experience. For many essential and security critical apps to work, like bank apps or the McDonald's app you need to hide the fact you're using a modified system, because of SafetyNet. This hiding/bypass works for now, because it tricks Goo…
Sure, but your LineageOS only works because Google is forcing manufacturers to pass CTS tests (which ensure that all Android devices are actually compatible with your apps). If that disappears, you'll end up with apps that only work on Samsung Androids and your LineageOS will stop being compatible. We're essentially going back to horrorshow of SymbianOS, where different Symbian devices weren't compatible between them…
Re: S.Korea fines Google $177M for blocking Android customisation
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Give me a Librem 5 with an SoC that isn't hot garbage and I'd buy it immediately.
Do you mean that it heats up too much? I don't think this is accurate after latest updates. Also, suspend is not implemented yet. It will greatly increase the battery life and make it colder.