Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do people always bring up accomplishments at spacex in arguments about Tesla
> Why do people always bring up accomplishments at spacex in arguments about Tesla I think some of these people believe Elon is personally designing and engineering these things, so naturally it carries over. Gwynne Shotwell doesn't get enough credit.
The Tesla Semi Is an Engineering Failure
41–45 of 45 posts
Re: The Tesla Semi Is an Engineering Failure
#42Re: The Tesla Semi Is an Engineering Failure
#43The video argues that, with current battery technology, to achieve the same range as a current semi, most of the weight of the truck will be batteries, leaving little weight for cargo (3 tonnes relative to 19 tonnes). I've noticed there is a common theme to arguments against electrification: that they assume it's necessary for an electric vehicle needs to match all the capabilities of a fossil fuel equivalent. i.e. t…
Re: The Tesla Semi Is an Engineering Failure
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or just swap out the batteries on the way. I think someone on here once suggested to do so at existing weigh stations in the US.
Swappable battery packs seem like a good idea. It might even be faster than waiting to pump 100 gallons of fuel. I'm thinking existing truck stops would have a better chance of working than the weigh stations. let's leave the government it, they are barely competent at weighing a truck. Some trucks might not see a weigh station for a week. Some stations are nothing more than a pull out on the side of the road.
Re: The Tesla Semi Is an Engineering Failure
#45I understand the drivetrain weight argument, but this guy makes money off these negative viewpoints so.. now my YouTube feed is gonna be conspiracy theories.
> conspiracy theories I get the feeling you use this phrase to dismiss anything you don't like. Nothing about this video at all describes or relates to a conspiracy.