Live data from Hacker News

European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

patrick-breyer.de

41–50 of 434 posts

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#42
post #37
post #10

Would any email provider protect me from this, get my emails actually delivered and ideally work with my own domain? Not that I see myself switching after 15 years and 6 Gmail accounts but if I am to I'd rather know who I'd use. And no I won't risk setting it up myself and risk missing on some portion of my emails like I've had happen at workplaces before we'd sigh and switch to Google. For Chat tg/signal seem like t…

If you want your email reliably encrypted, encrypt it yourself. GPG works the same regardless of the provider.

Only if you assume that the only valuable thing in your communications is the content, which is simply not true. Metadata, who is speaking to whom and when, is incredibly valuable as a surveillance tool.

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#44
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but how sustainable is the EU really, in the long term? I’m still convinced it will either dissolve or devolve into a rump organization within my lifetime.

Well, I'm assuming that's one of the things that total pervasive surveillance and control of communication is meant to address.

Seems like acting with that intent with this power is an easy way to accelerate the EU’s own dissolution.

The Warsaw Pact, the Cold War, the Iron Curtain across Europe and the Berlin Wall, as well as the communist surveillance States that still-living Europeans lived within and remember well enough was not that long ago.

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It mentions in the article that even apps like Signal would have to install backdoors that they can use.

That can't happen with open-source, whether it's "free" or not.

it can if you don't compile the source yourself, a la the app store

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It mentions in the article that even apps like Signal would have to install backdoors that they can use.

That can't happen with open-source, whether it's "free" or not.

That's not how this works in practice

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#47
post #8

this is the only place where this can be found. Would love to know more from someone perhaps a little bit less involved.

I couldn't find anything else either: When I do a shallow google search for "EU mass surveillance", I find articles referring to a loophole in AI rules for mass surveillance and some articles stating that mass surveillance can only be for national security - and the most recent is in April.

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#48
post #37
post #10

Would any email provider protect me from this, get my emails actually delivered and ideally work with my own domain? Not that I see myself switching after 15 years and 6 Gmail accounts but if I am to I'd rather know who I'd use. And no I won't risk setting it up myself and risk missing on some portion of my emails like I've had happen at workplaces before we'd sigh and switch to Google. For Chat tg/signal seem like t…

If you want your email reliably encrypted, encrypt it yourself. GPG works the same regardless of the provider.

and I guess that using GPG will instantly flag you as suspect :-(

Re: European Parliament approves mass surveillance of private communication

#49
post #3

I think it's the establishment, i.e. the old wealthy families who run things, are very concerned with the migrants crisis and the real possibility to lose control.

I'm partial to blaming the lizard people as, being lizard people, they don't have feelings.
Post reply on HN