Midair Collision over Denver
41–50 of 237 posts
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#42Just in case anyone (like me) is thinking - wait did that aeroplane have a parachute? From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_Airframe_Parachute_Sy... The Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS) is a whole-plane ballistic parachute recovery system designed specifically for Cirrus Aircraft's line of general aviation light aircraft including the SR20, SR22 and SF50. The design became the first of its kind to becom…
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#43Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#44Just in case anyone (like me) is thinking - wait did that aeroplane have a parachute? From: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_Airframe_Parachute_Sy... The Cirrus Airframe Parachute System (CAPS) is a whole-plane ballistic parachute recovery system designed specifically for Cirrus Aircraft's line of general aviation light aircraft including the SR20, SR22 and SF50. The design became the first of its kind to becom…
The more generic system is called BRS, Ballistic Recovery Systems. They deliver this as an option for many small aircraft and it's popular for experimental / home built aircraft. One downside of the systems is that they typically have a maximum lifespan of 10 years while airframes last 50+ years. So every 10 years there is a large maintenance cost to replace/renew the parachute system. Much less an issue for a $ 800k…
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
The more generic system is called BRS, Ballistic Recovery Systems. They deliver this as an option for many small aircraft and it's popular for experimental / home built aircraft. One downside of the systems is that they typically have a maximum lifespan of 10 years while airframes last 50+ years. So every 10 years there is a large maintenance cost to replace/renew the parachute system. Much less an issue for a $ 800k…
Am I correct in saying after one usage, the parachute system generally needs replaced? I think I read this about Cirrus planes anyway
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#46For such a serious accident this seems about the best possible outcome for the crew of both aircraft. I'm not an expert so I'm not going to comment on root cause or blame here, but simply glad to read that at least everybody survived.
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Am I correct in saying after one usage, the parachute system generally needs replaced? I think I read this about Cirrus planes anyway
I believe the whole airplane needs to be replaced after BRS use.
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Am I correct in saying after one usage, the parachute system generally needs replaced? I think I read this about Cirrus planes anyway
I believe the whole airplane needs to be replaced after BRS use.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cirrus_Airframe_Parachute_Syst...
Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#49Re: Midair Collision over Denver
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
I believe the whole airplane needs to be replaced after BRS use.
It may sound pointless unless you consider that the pilot will not need to be replaced.