Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

unrealwill.github.io

41–50 of 129 posts

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#41
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If all you’ve done is flip a sign, it’s a little disingenuous to say “by GistNoesis“.

This version didn't exist until GistNoesis flipped the sign, so no, it's not. This gets to a larger philosophy of open source: we should encourage people to fork when they want to iterate on someone else's work, however minor that iteration may be. This is open source working as intended.

If you take something that took hours to build and (as is claimed) spend 1 minute modifying it, you absolutely have no right to claim it’s “by” you. I think everyone except you agrees on that.

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#42

After playing Hatetris https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27063894 yesterday on HN, I decided I would rather have the AI on my side so I forked the site and flipped a sign. If your life feels like Hatetris, Lovetris will bring you comfort. Enjoy :)

Very nice! My initial reaction is: it's not giving me the piece I want. It's trying to force you to clear individual lines as soon as it is possible to do so. But in real Tetris, you want to clear four lines at a time to get double score, which may mean withholding a line clear when you could have done one. Consider this replay: హටເח௨ඞܗТۑටܢݹ௫੬ຽߢ௧ලບঅযلЈǶ It ends by giving me nothing but S pieces, because it wants me t…

I tried to see if I could stack a tetris. Made a 3 wide well, the game would give me L pieces to fill in the single line. Which made it pretty easy to stack up. At some point it gave me a single I piece, which I put in the middle of the 3 deep well. I would either get more I pieces or an L piece which I put in the well, the game would proceed to give me I pieces.

ҫටไଈۑටހঅ௧ΧІݶݼق໑অௐRʈঅ௨ఢȵݶԳقฒߢ௨ఢƔݹடٴໃٳɺقຯঐ౬ΟໃƁԈقໄɕலۇȣJலปາஞݫටࠋऐഹටоࡨ௩ѻІԔԥಘϾঀƥقഥಕ௨vІðƐටƚࡨ௨uಸݹறঔໃΥeٯໃҾkقബເवॴຯɛ௨කТ൫ஸڐໃپϢඡಋڝ௨ΣІݞ౻ටࠄঅடڠາɚ௨ౚ༣ݹބقଡɕષقࠄঅटقԀɕ௧uଈݡКʈເŧݸටඨࡖ௨ࡆІܥ౮قଞݸƕقܢઝடٴໃܤƓقฮࡈ௨ඉʑݢ౻ඥСݸ౫ඡಋঅஐٴໃܡవටଥɕஜؿϽߡƗࡕ

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#43
Apparently the game can out you in a corner where you can not win:

ࠁටໃݶԣலໃݹࠅॴໃݛԥ੯ටஈ௨ඥ೦ݹ௨ඥಸݹ௨ටമ๐௨ൽഉݹݹقາڭ௨ටഫݑСටໃԓ௦૫ໃݹ௨ටໃݹ௨ටໃxħقໃƬݴΟໃKЭइໃC౻ටຯٲಏقแڽ௨ఢƔݹரٯໃԔޛඥДݹߚฃໂɛԥడM൵௨బໞݹҬɦషݸßࡇHܤЪsເלԚؿИݷƶ

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#44
post #6

as someone who has an ocd need to get the 4 line tetris clear this triggers me

Please do not trivialize having OCD like that- In reality, it's a debilitating disorder characterized by severe compulsions.

Or use the word “trigger” to mean mere annoyance. It is tragic that people with a hatred of people living with conditions like PTSD and epilepsy have turned that word into a joke. (I guess most people who use that word now are unaware of this history.) I know people who experience actual triggers and it's a very painful thing.

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#45
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This version didn't exist until GistNoesis flipped the sign, so no, it's not. This gets to a larger philosophy of open source: we should encourage people to fork when they want to iterate on someone else's work, however minor that iteration may be. This is open source working as intended.

If you take something that took hours to build and (as is claimed) spend 1 minute modifying it, you absolutely have no right to claim it’s “by” you. I think everyone except you agrees on that.

> I think everyone except you agrees on that

As a member of “everyone”, would you please not put words in my mouth.

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#46
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This version didn't exist until GistNoesis flipped the sign, so no, it's not. This gets to a larger philosophy of open source: we should encourage people to fork when they want to iterate on someone else's work, however minor that iteration may be. This is open source working as intended.

If you take something that took hours to build and (as is claimed) spend 1 minute modifying it, you absolutely have no right to claim it’s “by” you. I think everyone except you agrees on that.

Well they also changed the name, so this new concept of Lovetris is by the new author, even if the code to make it possible is not. Lots of references to the old work as well, similar distribution (e.g. not paid), etc. If I was the author of Hatetris I'd be happy for this version!

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#47
post #45
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you take something that took hours to build and (as is claimed) spend 1 minute modifying it, you absolutely have no right to claim it’s “by” you. I think everyone except you agrees on that.

> I think everyone except you agrees on that As a member of “everyone”, would you please not put words in my mouth.

”I think”

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#48
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you take something that took hours to build and (as is claimed) spend 1 minute modifying it, you absolutely have no right to claim it’s “by” you. I think everyone except you agrees on that.

Well they also changed the name, so this new concept of Lovetris is by the new author, even if the code to make it possible is not. Lots of references to the old work as well, similar distribution (e.g. not paid), etc. If I was the author of Hatetris I'd be happy for this version!

> they also changed the name

Is that a serious argument? If you write a techno song, and I take it, turn up the BPM and publish it as “by me”, would it help my case that I also changed the name of the song?

Re: Show HN: Lovetris – Tetris which always gives you the best piece

#49

After playing Hatetris https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27063894 yesterday on HN, I decided I would rather have the AI on my side so I forked the site and flipped a sign. If your life feels like Hatetris, Lovetris will bring you comfort. Enjoy :)

Very nice! My initial reaction is: it's not giving me the piece I want. It's trying to force you to clear individual lines as soon as it is possible to do so. But in real Tetris, you want to clear four lines at a time to get double score, which may mean withholding a line clear when you could have done one. Consider this replay: హටເח௨ඞܗТۑටܢݹ௫੬ຽߢ௧ලບঅযلЈǶ It ends by giving me nothing but S pieces, because it wants me t…

Could someone please explain what the string after "consider this replay" is?

I see a combination of characters loosely looking like some East Asian alphabet, I guess that this is some kind of encoding ?

Post reply on HN