Live data from Hacker News

Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

readme.so

41–50 of 69 posts

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Price hike", really? I would not exactly call 6.67 euros a month a rip-off. Given your reaction to it, it seems like a very reasonable policy to ensure that people claiming a URL really have plans with it, while keeping out foreigners parking on Somalian webpace for the lulz. EDIT: some context that is probably relevant to this topic that I should not presume to be familiar with everyone is the controversy surroundi…

I'm old enough to remember personal websites being a thing, before everyone and their company went over on that Face Site. I had a personal site back than which IIRC 2010 or 2011-ish I moved to the domain I mentioned, and, at the time, I kept updating the site somewhat regularly (before than I had a .de domain, which was really darn cheap and the site was in German only). The .so NIC "adjusted" the price IIRC around…

There's nothing ad-hominem in my response, I just question your assessment that 80 euros a year is forcing you to "pay through the nose".

Describing these events the way you do makes it sound as if you're being blackmailed or something. You're not. The Somalian government have the right to handle the .so domains however they please. If they demand that people are either Somali or otherwise pay a fee of 80 euros, there is nothing inherently wrong with that. If you find that an unreasonable price, go elsewhere. Nobody is forcing you to buy the domain. Which, as far as I can tell, is what you did.

Basically, what I don't understand is why you describe the event in a way that makes it sound as if they denied you something that you were entitled to when that was not the case.

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#42
This would be useful as part of the new repo creation workflow on GitHub too. Instead of just getting an empty readme, pick the sections you want and start with one that just needs to be filled in. Could autopopulate some sections too (eg, license). I’d rather that so I can edit in my regular editor without having to use a separate site and web editor to get that initial template.

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#43

As the founder of a quite similarly named company, this looks great :) Not sure if you're looking for a job Katherine, but if you are my email is in my profile!

This felt genuine. But I must admit, asking someone launching something if they're looking for a job rubbed me the wrong way. :shrug:

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#46
post #43

As the founder of a quite similarly named company, this looks great :) Not sure if you're looking for a job Katherine, but if you are my email is in my profile!

This felt genuine. But I must admit, asking someone launching something if they're looking for a job rubbed me the wrong way. :shrug:

I would never try to dampen someone's enthusiasm for launching a company!

However, based on how she talks about readme.so on Twitter and the fact that it's free and open source, it's clear she built it just to build something cool.

If she's open to a job, then she gets to continue working on something called ReadMe that's in a similar vein! If she's not, for whatever reason, then there's no harm done and I hope she takes my comment as a compliment :)

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#47

A VSCode extension (triggered on README.* files) that does this would be very nice to have

I went ahead and created vscode-readme it takes the templates used on readme.so and creates a snippet per section and if you use the readme snippet it combines all the sections https://github.com/ThreeCommaIO/vscode-readme. I just published to the extensions marketplace too.

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm old enough to remember personal websites being a thing, before everyone and their company went over on that Face Site. I had a personal site back than which IIRC 2010 or 2011-ish I moved to the domain I mentioned, and, at the time, I kept updating the site somewhat regularly (before than I had a .de domain, which was really darn cheap and the site was in German only). The .so NIC "adjusted" the price IIRC around…

There's nothing ad-hominem in my response, I just question your assessment that 80 euros a year is forcing you to "pay through the nose". Describing these events the way you do makes it sound as if you're being blackmailed or something. You're not. The Somalian government have the right to handle the .so domains however they please. If they demand that people are either Somali or otherwise pay a fee of 80 euros, ther…

Governments aren't businesses. They don't, and really shouldn't think of making money first. Top priority should be the interest of their citizens. Besides funding public services and utilities through fees and taxes, governments can use those to incentivize certain behavior, either by making it cheaper than doing otherwise, or by making it more expensive, i.e. penalize it.

I get that (I went to to high school). And I don't have any objections here.

When you buy a fancy ccTLD from a foreign country, you are [most likely] dealing with a government, not a businesses. It is their perfect right to decide that their citizens should be prioritized. They increase the fees 4-fould for anyone without a citizenship to incentivize them to go elsewhere.

When you buy a fancy ccTLD from a foreign country, that's a risk you take and something you should be aware off. That's my whole point.

From my perspective the following happened: I did take that risk. One day, my domain hoster told me to either send them a copy of my Somalian pass port, or I'd have to pay more. So at first I thought, I'll just pony up some more cash then. I already thought that domain prices are mostly fictional, given what I'm really paying for, but then I got a bill that made me go "Smoley Hokes! Now that's a lot of money for a domain name!". I didn't react like you and divided it by 12, rather I started comparing the price tag to other things I would much rather buy for that money, then I started multiplying it, because it's per year and quickly realized that that's just a lower bound, since I have no guarantee, that there isn't another price increase in 2 years or so. So I thought "Well, it's just a personal website, I'll get a domain somewhere else then, better be safe and use a non ccTLD". Even now, if I divide it by 12, I'd still rather buy my favorite take away menu at the Vietnamese place across the street once a month for 6.90.

The registrar giveth and the registrar taketh away. There were no demands made, no tears shed, no curses uttered and no fists shaken. What it boiled down to on my side was a couple minutes of getting a fresh drink, thinking up a new domain name that made me chuckle a little and hacking away.

Seeing a link to a .so domain on HN a couple years later made me remember the whole story and peeked my curiosity. And sure enough, there was a commend devoted to the domain. I chimed in, posting a very brief description of my personal anecdote. I added an extra line, pointing out the new, domain name I got as a replacement, thinking someone might appreciate the joke (it got a few laughs last time I mentioned it, but to be fair, everyone involved was already slightly intoxicated). In my original comment I made no allegations against anyone. I did not discuss the motivations of any of the parties involved (including my own), or local politics in Somalia or any of the socioeconomic implications of this story. I tried to point out, using a personal annecdote, why buying a fancy, foreign ccTLD might be problematic, as a remark on a question asked, foolishly assuming that most of this should be clear and it would be enough to just provide the key details of my story.

I'm sorry if I picked the wrong words or something that have some weird semantics or implications that I wasn't aware of (not being a native English speaker and all), but I have the feeling that I'm suddenly in a situation where I have words put in my mouth and fingers pointed at me, being framed as a freeloading baddie, based on things I never intended to say. That made me slightly annoyed, so sorry if my earlier response was a little harsh.

// Goliath

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Like what?

Some years back, I used to be the proud owner of "libgoliath.so", but then they suddenly decided to hike the price to IIRC Euro 80,- per year (either that, or prove that I have a Somalian citicenship). So I dropped that. So now I'm the proud owner of "goliath32.com", which I currently keep parked until I finally, hopefully get around to overhauling my 10 year old personal site.

Looking towards the future, maybe you should snag goliath64.com, and while you're at it, maybe GOLIATH.DLL

Re: Readme.so – Easiest Way to Create a Readme

#50
post #36

By all early metrics, this project looks like it can become extremely popular and healthy. If you switch to the impact view in the following: https://public-001.gitsense.com/insights/github/repos?q=wind... And look at the impact chart at the bottom, it has all the signs of a healthy/popular project. A high number of contributors in Zone 3 indicates strong interest. A decent number of contributors in Zone 2, indicates…

Well firstly, it's common courtesy to state it upfront if you have a conflict of interest (E.g. you work for the company being discussed or you're linking something of your own).

Secondly, I suspect some people may not like the idea of these kind of metrics.

Post reply on HN