Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

pastebin.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

41–50 of 103 posts

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#42

Post by thadeus_venture »

thadeus_venture wrote: post #29
trotsky wrote: post #11

Hmm * mentions HBGary a lot * focuses on people who have been previously associated with the HBGary hack * shows special disdain for kayla and sabu & seems to be personally offended * likes to link people to their social networking profiles * only non-skiddie name mentioned is Barr's * obviously works (worked?) in infosec * previously in the military? (ALPHA MIKE FOXTROT = Adios Mother Fuckers) Gee, I wonder who the…

Wonder if the spelling mistakes are strategically placed then. Or does Mr. Barr really spell that way. He's like a 40+ year old married guy.

OT: There another comment here by trotsky here and now it's gone without a [deleted] placeholder, and I have show dead on. Just curious, I guess there is a perm delete admin functionality? Also didn't seem worthy of deletion..

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#43

Post by SeoxyS »

I personally applaud the unmasking of the internet's anonymous. Maybe once they realize they're not truly anonymous, they'll stop with their appalling behavior. What they're doing exemplifies everything that is wrong with our sensationalist, power-hungry and generally corrupted culture.

This kind of mob-trolling behavior is not ok, and prosecuting perpetrators to the full extend of the law ought to set a nice example.

I'm all for free speech, and blowing the whistle. But this is much too far, and honestly, anarchy isn't any better than a police state.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#44

Post by mcav »

thadeus_venture wrote: post #42
thadeus_venture wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wonder if the spelling mistakes are strategically placed then. Or does Mr. Barr really spell that way. He's like a 40+ year old married guy.

OT: There another comment here by trotsky here and now it's gone without a [deleted] placeholder, and I have show dead on. Just curious, I guess there is a perm delete admin functionality? Also didn't seem worthy of deletion..

While I wouldn't be surprised if it got deleted, if you elect to delete your own post, there's no placeholder left behind if there's no reply.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#45

Post by trotsky »

m0nastic wrote: post #36
sliverstorm wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most importantly, if a random group posting to pastebin can find them, the FBI has got to be able to, too.

To be fair, a random group posting to patebin isn't limited by things like "probable cause" "search warrants" and "lawful behavior". They admit in the document to "backhacking" the targets, which already puts them at an advantage against law enforcement. edit: s/probably/probable (it's late)

LEO can and does get warrants to do intrusions for identification purposes

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Computer_and_...

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#47

Post by trotsky »

thadeus_venture wrote: post #42
thadeus_venture wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wonder if the spelling mistakes are strategically placed then. Or does Mr. Barr really spell that way. He's like a 40+ year old married guy.

OT: There another comment here by trotsky here and now it's gone without a [deleted] placeholder, and I have show dead on. Just curious, I guess there is a perm delete admin functionality? Also didn't seem worthy of deletion..

I deleted it, it was redundant.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#49

Post by nyellin »

SeoxyS wrote: post #43

I personally applaud the unmasking of the internet's anonymous. Maybe once they realize they're not truly anonymous, they'll stop with their appalling behavior. What they're doing exemplifies everything that is wrong with our sensationalist, power-hungry and generally corrupted culture. This kind of mob-trolling behavior is not ok, and prosecuting perpetrators to the full extend of the law ought to set a nice example…

The paste has an anonymous author.

Re: Lulzsec/gn0sis/AnonOps dox'd

#50

Post by Zadoc »

Drakeman wrote: post #17
[deleted] wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

They aren't proof, but they might be enough (I am not a lawyer) for a search warrant for email addresses, person's homes, and phone/ISP records of the people named in the "d0x."

Law enforcement doesn't need warrants for that. The companies will hand them over willingly.
Post reply on HN