Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 88.0

mozilla.org

41–50 of 209 posts

Re: Firefox 88.0

#41
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this using the browser's own JS engine? Do things like NoScript allow one to turn off PDF JS? On the flip side, are there any examples of PDF JS being actually useful and not a vector for tracking/exploits?

You can't use plugins like NoScript with PDFs on Firefox: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1454760

interesting, could you embed a pdf into a webpage that has some JS which triggers automatically? Even if you have noscript?

Re: Firefox 88.0

#42
post #8

> Print updates: Margin units are now localized. Print in firefox is totally broken. The change to Chromium was the last nail in the coffin for printing. The new web does not care.

??? I print through Firefox all the time with no issues. What exactly were you experiencing?

I wouldn't say that Firefox specifically is worse at it than other browsers though, but I kind of agree with parent comment that the "new web" doesn't care about printing.

On more and more pages I encounter issues like the printer only printing out the cookie warning window, or just the left navigation bar, etc. and none of the actual page content that I wanted to print. Or content goes up to the first in-line advertisement and then cuts of there with just blank pages coming out of the printer after that. Or weird pagination issues where there's text on page 1 and text on page 2, but there's a bunch of text missing in between that is otherwise visible fine on the screen.

I'm talking about web pages that don't specifically have a "print" button on them. If it looks like the page is using a fancy layout I typically now just do a screenshot and print the resulting .png.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#43

I just switched from FF to Brave. Despite the unnecessarily built-in adblocking (I prefer blocking on router level + 2nd layer via ublock) and the BAT stuff, it is a good browser. It feels so fast and snappy. I wished FF was as fast. Macbook Air M1

The best I ever did for performance was switching away from macOS. Sure, Safari and Chrome is really fast on Mac hardware/macOS, but nothing beats the performance of Firefox on Linux.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#44
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

PDFs are definitely not Turing complete. [0] [0] https://www.cs.odu.edu/~zeil/cs390/latest/Public/turing-comp...

Ah I see I may have been thinking of Postscript. Though I'm not entirely convinced they haven't accidentally added Turing completeness back in at some point. I mean you don't really need all that much to write a basic lisp interpreter.

Well, now that you mention it..... It's likely that PDFs in Firefox are Turing Complete, since JS is Turing Complete.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#45
post #17

>The ‘Take a Screenshot’ feature was removed from the Page Actions menu in the url bar. Odd, this is the only place I accessed it from. Not a big deal as it's still on the context menu and also can be added as a tool bar item but I am curious the rationalization behind this change. That seemed like a great place to have it to me.

When I first tried to use it, I knew of the feature but couldn't find it. They probably have metrics on it being underutilized so they want to bring it forward a bit or so.

But I think the whole "page actions" button is too hidden. I think screenshot belongs there, and the issue is that most people don't know without being told that "page actions" is something that even exists.

It's great btw to take screenshot of loooong web pages smoothly.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#46
Side note: I don't know how often this happens but it's kinda cool that Firefox went straight from 87.0 to 88.0 without any sub-versions. They didn't seem to have any security/bug patches, they just got it right on the first try.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#47
post #6
post #3

> PDF forms now support JavaScript embedded in PDF files. Some PDF forms use JavaScript for validation and other interactive features. The amount of complexity that one can put into a PDF is both surprising and a tad frightening.

Is this using the browser's own JS engine? Do things like NoScript allow one to turn off PDF JS? On the flip side, are there any examples of PDF JS being actually useful and not a vector for tracking/exploits?

It does get used for interactive forms. The native PDF form handling is more simplistic.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#48
Mozilla, can we have bookmarks back for new tabs in Android?

Collections seemingly reinvent the wheel but limit the number of bookmarks, and force me to swipe left to view them.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#49

I thought FTP support had been removed a long time ago for some reason! I have very fond memories of FTP but I guess its time has come. I probably haven't used it for 10 years at this point.

I used it yesterday. I regularly use FTP at work, well preferably SFTP but it does happen.

While we have a automatic deployment pipeline for our own projects, lots of our customers that host externally still use good old FTP.

I don't think FTP is ever going to fully die. It is still a typical way to deploy your files when using a shared web hosting that does not offer SSH.

Re: Firefox 88.0

#50
post #8

> Print updates: Margin units are now localized. Print in firefox is totally broken. The change to Chromium was the last nail in the coffin for printing. The new web does not care.

> The change to Chromium was the last nail in the coffin for printing.

I don’t think that Firefox uses code from Chromium for printing, does it? I believe that the print interface merely resembles that of Chromium.

Post reply on HN