Lowe's Feb 2021 article was about antibodies, not T-cells,
https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/02/10/do...> Now, you can still make an argument that the T cell component of immunity might provide some protection after a previous coronavirus infection. The current study didn’t address this directly
Lowe's July 2020 article on T-cells, https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/07/15/ne...
> there are, in fact, people who have both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that recognize protein antigens from the new coronavirus even though they have never been exposed to SARS, MERS, or the new virus. The paper speculated that this might be due to cross-reactivity with proteins from the “common cold” coronaviruses”, and raised the possibility that there might be a part of the population that has at least some existing protection against the current pandemic.
and
> patients who had caught SARS back in 2003 and recovered ... still have (17 years later!) a robust T-cell response to the original SARS coronavirus’s N protein ..This new work finds that these cross-react with the new SARS CoV-2 N protein as well
There is an open question in the Nature study, about prior, unknown animal coronaviruses which may have previously infected humans and conferred T-cell protection against SARS-CoV-2.