Live data from Hacker News

Uncovering a 24-year-old bug in the Linux Kernel

engineering.skroutz.gr

41–44 of 44 posts

Re: Uncovering a 24-year-old bug in the Linux Kernel

#41
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's like watching a murder mystery unfold. It feels really daunting to dive this deep into a bug on its vague symptoms. It's probably the selection bias for what gets on the HN front page, but it feels like a large minority here can tackle something like this. I have trouble imaging having that much of a handle on Linux to feel comfortable hot patching the kernel because I suspect something is wrong in the networkin…

Also, their networking troubleshooting inside linux is solid aswell. There are very few engineers who seem to understand the details of TCP, especially it's more obscure aspects.

As somebody who implemented a small user-space tcp long ago, I get always uneasy when people tell me they just put events into some message queue and never consider all the edge cases that can happen when either the MQ or the consuming servers choke up. The problems are pretty much the same as with TCP flow control. It is easy to build a software that only appears to be working well.

Re: Uncovering a 24-year-old bug in the Linux Kernel

#44
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently the British army were told to break step when crossing bridges to avoid that potential disaster. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broughton_Suspension_Bridge

I think it's common military training in a lot of places. I'm italian, my dad did his service in the Engineering corps (Genio) and he told me the same story. No lock step while crossing bridges.

Never had it in re bridges, but "no lock-step while carrying a stretcher" was a mandatory part for me.
Post reply on HN