Live data from Hacker News

Loon’s final flight

blog.x.company

41–50 of 264 posts

Re: Loon’s final flight

#41
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the days of Google Moonshots are coming to a close. In general Google hasn't been very good at shooting for the moon. They've lost their leadership and vision and all that's left is a giant advertising behemoth. Did any of their moonshots really hit the mark or even come close?

Brain is doing great and Waymo probably at least hits close.

[deleted]

Re: Loon’s final flight

#44

Hey, 9 years is a pretty good run for any product, especially a ambitious one with no clear revenue model. And the shuttering is paired with a $10M donation to continue the support of the mission. I know Google gets hate for shutting things down, but they have hundreds of products – I can't think of any other tech company with such a wide range of products. They make bets, and with bets comes a certain amount of fail…

Does google have anything successful outside of: search, adsense, chrome, chromebooks, and android? Those are all large accomplishments to be sure, but it seems like they should have more products out there that people actually buy.

Cloud happens to be a multibillion dollar business.

Re: Loon’s final flight

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the days of Google Moonshots are coming to a close. In general Google hasn't been very good at shooting for the moon. They've lost their leadership and vision and all that's left is a giant advertising behemoth. Did any of their moonshots really hit the mark or even come close?

That's what moonshots are though, there is a high statistical possibility that 0/100 makes it.

We put a man on the moon though? I thought a moonshot was hard but doable.

Re: Loon’s final flight

#46
I don't think they will, but I really wish they would open source and release some technical data on exactly what components/subsystems and design they were using for photovoltaic panels, charge control and monitoring systems, and batteries.

Re: Loon’s final flight

#47
post #33

Well if you want to attempt something big without having to work with company's like Google then Elon Musk made an interesting offer today. Musk is offering $100 million to the team providing the best carbon capture technology. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-musk-carbon-capture/e...

Judged by the person who thinks putting cars in tunnels is the solution to urban transit? No thanks. Your average third grader is a more qualified engineer than Elon Musk.

Re: Loon’s final flight

#48
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the days of Google Moonshots are coming to a close. In general Google hasn't been very good at shooting for the moon. They've lost their leadership and vision and all that's left is a giant advertising behemoth. Did any of their moonshots really hit the mark or even come close?

Waymo seems like it's nearing its final stages. I have high hopes!

I think it's generous to say it's in its final stages. They haven't even left Phoenix have they? And even in Phoenix, it's still largely a beta project in a few predefined areas.

It certainly seems like Google's most likely moon shot to take off. But considering only a few thousand people have used it, it's not exactly a big success.

Re: Loon’s final flight

#49

Hey, 9 years is a pretty good run for any product, especially a ambitious one with no clear revenue model. And the shuttering is paired with a $10M donation to continue the support of the mission. I know Google gets hate for shutting things down, but they have hundreds of products – I can't think of any other tech company with such a wide range of products. They make bets, and with bets comes a certain amount of fail…

Does google have anything successful outside of: search, adsense, chrome, chromebooks, and android? Those are all large accomplishments to be sure, but it seems like they should have more products out there that people actually buy.

[deleted]

Re: Loon’s final flight

#50
post #19
post #5

Given that Starlink will probably solve the same set of problems within a few years (that being access to internet worldwide in areas with minimal infrastructure) this isn't too much of a surprise to me.

You connect to Loon balloons with your regular cellphone whereas StarLink requires a "pizza-box-sized" antenna. They solve slightly different problems.

It's likely easier to set up a solar powered cell tower on the ground with a starlink antenna on top, than to float the same equipment on a balloon though.
Post reply on HN