Live data from Hacker News

Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

locusmag.com

41–50 of 255 posts

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#41
post #19

"There is no way for us to defend ourselves: even skilled technologists who administer their own networked services are no match for the bandits. To keep bandits out, you have to be perfect and perfectly vigilant, and never make a single mistake. For the bandits to get you, they need merely find a single mistake that you’ve made." Ooof. What a boot-to-the-face reminder. Despite my use of a Tor Router, three ubikeys a…

If what you are communicating needs to be guaranteed to never be crackable, you only need to use the oldest and most secure way of communicating before the days of internet and computers: short wave transmitted one time pad codes. The reason that number stations continue to operate is that it really is the best way to communicate/order under surveillance which almost certainly is happening in every embassy in non-fri…

> If what you are communicating needs to be guaranteed to never be crackable, you only need to use the oldest and most secure way of communicating before the days of internet and computers: short wave transmitted one time pad codes.

I'd say using a dead drop is probably even older and more secure. I don't think it'd attract any extra attention unless you're already being followed.

A numbers station is really only useful to a particular use case that seems exclusive to nation-state spies: you don't care who knows you're transmitting, but you need the message and the location of the recipient to be absolutely secure.

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#43
post #3

What really puzzles me about Apple fans and it's userbase is that they do not care . They simply do not care at all what's being done to them. It's the strongest example of consumer cultism. Absolute in their exceptionalism and ignorance. Similar problems discussed in the article are found in Tesla. The lowest common denominator of consumer cultism is surveillance and it's no surprise that both Apple and Tesla do exc…

Ah yes, let me guess... we should all move to Linux & Pinephone right?

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#44
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

fun reminder that canonical refuses to use tls on their repos

Do you have reason to believe there's a problem with the gpg signatures in their repo?

The GPG sigs that are also published over MITMable unencrypted http?

http://archive.canonical.com/dists/xenial/Release.gpg

Yeah, I believe I see a problem there...

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#45
post #3

What really puzzles me about Apple fans and it's userbase is that they do not care . They simply do not care at all what's being done to them. It's the strongest example of consumer cultism. Absolute in their exceptionalism and ignorance. Similar problems discussed in the article are found in Tesla. The lowest common denominator of consumer cultism is surveillance and it's no surprise that both Apple and Tesla do exc…

> What really puzzles me about Apple fans and it's userbase is that they do not care. They simply do not care at all what's being done to them.

From what I see in discussions: they do care. But it seems they have simply accepted Apple as a benevolent dictator.

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#46
post #45
post #3

What really puzzles me about Apple fans and it's userbase is that they do not care . They simply do not care at all what's being done to them. It's the strongest example of consumer cultism. Absolute in their exceptionalism and ignorance. Similar problems discussed in the article are found in Tesla. The lowest common denominator of consumer cultism is surveillance and it's no surprise that both Apple and Tesla do exc…

> What really puzzles me about Apple fans and it's userbase is that they do not care. They simply do not care at all what's being done to them. From what I see in discussions: they do care. But it seems they have simply accepted Apple as a benevolent dictator.

To use the article's terminology, Apple is the lord of the manor which makes owners of Apple hardware, serfs.

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#47
post #19

"There is no way for us to defend ourselves: even skilled technologists who administer their own networked services are no match for the bandits. To keep bandits out, you have to be perfect and perfectly vigilant, and never make a single mistake. For the bandits to get you, they need merely find a single mistake that you’ve made." Ooof. What a boot-to-the-face reminder. Despite my use of a Tor Router, three ubikeys a…

If what you are communicating needs to be guaranteed to never be crackable, you only need to use the oldest and most secure way of communicating before the days of internet and computers: short wave transmitted one time pad codes. The reason that number stations continue to operate is that it really is the best way to communicate/order under surveillance which almost certainly is happening in every embassy in non-fri…

It's not that I'm a spy. It's that I want to protect myself digitally as much as possible, despite being forced to interface with the internet by large institutions.

We can go back and time and argue about the lack of security just four decades ago (George Hayduke[1] had a series of books on how to exfiltrate info in the 60's & 70's through social engineering). However, here we are: in a virtual world that is simultaneously more secure and less secure than ever. Compare: we have evolving security protocols that are being hardend every year by attacker's pushing on them, yet our entire lives are open like never before for the picking-off by one clever blackhat.

It is maddening, and I consider myself far more cognizant of the issues than a typical chain-letter sharing, 8-char all-text passwording, facebook user.

[1] https://www.amazon.com/Screw-Unto-Others-Revenge-Occasions/d...

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#48
post #38
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Consider that this blog post frames the issue as one of surveillance, instead of an anti-malware effort. It does address the idea of this system being intended to combat malware in the fourth and fifth paragraphs. The point it makes is that there's nothing stopping it from being used against legitimate software too, other than the benevolence of the "warlord" who controls it, so you're still just trusting them to p…

“you're still just trusting them to protect you and hoping they don't take advantage of it” That is exactly what Apple’s customers are doing. It actually a pretty normal feature of modern society to trust institutions or businesses not to take advantage of particular powers they have. It’s really bizarre to call a business a ‘warlord’. The converse, where we can’t trust any institution or business and we must all be…

Cory Doctorow is a sci-fi author and has written cyberpunk fiction, calling corporate empires "warlords" seems par for the genre. Scott Galloway has called GAFA "the four horseman" and Bruce Sterling calls them "the Stacks."

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#49
The diagnosis is correct, but the prescription is lacking. His technical idea is fine, but this is a political issue that cannot be solved by technical means alone.

If any 'warlord' implemented Doctorow's idea, they'd just weaken themselves. Eventually the legal and financial incentives will ensure the 'warlord' returns to form or is replaced. There's no replacement for a political pressure campaign to make digital neofeudalism obsolete by changing the relevant laws.

Re: Neofeudalism and the Digital Manor

#50
post #3

What really puzzles me about Apple fans and it's userbase is that they do not care . They simply do not care at all what's being done to them. It's the strongest example of consumer cultism. Absolute in their exceptionalism and ignorance. Similar problems discussed in the article are found in Tesla. The lowest common denominator of consumer cultism is surveillance and it's no surprise that both Apple and Tesla do exc…

They simply do not care at all what's being done to them. This is an ignorant view to take. I'm a pretty dedicated apple user but only because the other options don't have the tools I need and the UX I desire. Likely many of the flaws apple products have are piling up to a "straw that broke the camels back" situation for users in a few years or decades. When you assume other's intentions and feelings, bad things happ…

So you're saying that privacy (Apple knows what apps you're running and when) and autonomy (Apple controlling which apps you may run) are less important than the improvements which Apple has made to its OS over competitors?

This is totally fine. But there's where the friction between the two viewpoints is.

Post reply on HN