Live data from Hacker News

Boot a linux kernel right inside your browser.

bellard.org

41–50 of 255 posts

Re: Boot a linux kernel right inside your browser.

#42
Feel bad to miss out on this as I am on FF 3.6. But this remind reminded me of a service from a long time ago. Dont remember their name, this was some 10 years ago. But they used to provide a KDE desktop via the browser as a java applet. It was not terribly snappy, but quite surprisingly usable. Any one remembers this ?

Re: Boot a linux kernel right inside your browser.

#44
post #16

After FFmpeg (used in all your TVs and gadgets, very likely), QEmu (used also by Xen and VBox and other), tcc and his IOCC entries, the DVB-T emission with an ATI card, Fabrice comes, once again with something crazy... He is really impressive...

Don't forget that he discovered the fastest known algorithm for computing an arbitrary digit of pi. If you ever are tempted to get egotistical, just think of this guy. If you are prone to low self esteem, avoid reading about him.

No more excuses, I'm going to finish those damn projects I have on the backburner...

Seriously, who does Bellard work for?

He seems to leave virtually no trace (other than awesome software) on the Internet. I googled the shit out of him tonite...

Re: Boot a linux kernel right inside your browser.

#45
post #16

After FFmpeg (used in all your TVs and gadgets, very likely), QEmu (used also by Xen and VBox and other), tcc and his IOCC entries, the DVB-T emission with an ATI card, Fabrice comes, once again with something crazy... He is really impressive...

Any Macarthur Grant folks floating around here? Take note! That's an impressive resume.

Great idea. That guy deserves it. Though I suspect he would be too modest to accept the money since he GNUed all his creations.

Re: Boot a linux kernel right inside your browser.

#50
post #46

ERROR: your browser is too old to run JS/Linux. You should use a recent browser such as Firefox 4.x or Google Chrome. No, it isn't. Stop using user-agent matching and start using JavaScript feature detection instead.

It does. It tests for ArrayBuffer support, outputting that message if the necessary constructors aren't found. What browser are you using that you expect to be supported? (Safari doesn't have support for ArrayBuffer, but a recent WebKit nightly does, and this runs in that).
Post reply on HN