Live data from Hacker News

NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

workmanship.nasa.gov

41–50 of 60 posts

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#41
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NASA and aviation in general are later adopters of lead-free. It definitely wouldn't have been reflected in older standards.

On several levels. Avgas is still leaded.

Whoa, that's crazy. It's going to take 50+ years to get the current engines out of operation. I wonder if new engines are able to run without.

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#42
post #33
post #8

Was curious what their treatment was going to be regarding tin whiskers. Not much there (of course this is point in time inspection so it kind of makes sense), but a quick google revealed quite a bit of study: https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/ I thought they were just one of those low probability items until a Sunday morning when I was running live audio for a church service. Singer was mid verse and BOOOOM! Huge boomin…

> Was curious what their treatment was going to be regarding tin whiskers. Not much there (of course this is point in time inspection so it kind of makes sense) Did you read their specs? There's a small part about whiskers that already convey enough meaning: > UNACCEPTABLE WHISKER > A whisker is a slender needle-shaped metallic growth between a conductor and a land. Typically the result of mechanical stresses in high…

I did see that part, which is why I said 'not much' instead of 'nothing'.

The issue with whiskers is that they grow over time (which is why I mentioned 'point in time'). I didn't see anything in there about solder alloy selection or any other mitigation.

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#43

Every now and again this pops up on a different forum. I wonder how much is actually hand soldered any more vs. pick and place machines with SMT.

For low volume, it can cost more to set up the P&P machine, deal with alignments, check first articles, etc. than just soldering a few (dozen) board by hand. And there are a lot of small companies in niche markets whose annual production of a PC board might be in the single digits. That and, people who hand solder stuff all day are fast .

Some fab I checked out use manual pick and place if the quantity of boards is less than 100 since it probably takes more time to set up the automated stuff at such low volumes.

I’ve see the videos on IG every now and then on their hand soldering skills. So fast!

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#44
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the HN guidelines: 'Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."' It doesn't add anything to the discussion. And in this case it was very clear that the OP read the article and just missed that part. Your comment would have been just as informative and less snarky if it was simply: There's a small part…

> > Did you read the specs? > 'Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."' Not an article, but specs. You read specs carefully, you don't skim, especially to write long paragraphs about your personal experience > And in this case it was very clear that the OP read the article I disagree. Not read, skimmed…

>I agree: the most important part was indeed skipped.

You're factually wrong here. So the question would be where did this go off the rails?

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On several levels. Avgas is still leaded.

Wow, that's disgusting.

It's pretty limited. Avgas doesn't mean jet fuel, as used by commercial aviation, it means the stuff you pump into piston engine light aircraft. Plus, at the risk of being obvious, the exhaust is either emitted way up in the air or, if at ground level, out in the middle of nowhere at an airport.

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#46
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

NASA and aviation in general are later adopters of lead-free. It definitely wouldn't have been reflected in older standards.

On several levels. Avgas is still leaded.

For those who want to know more about this: https://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/news_story.cfm?newsId=1...

Essentially, we still don't have a viable replacement. The FAA was tasked with coming up with one by the end of 2018, but has been extended to 2021.

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#47
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On several levels. Avgas is still leaded.

Whoa, that's crazy. It's going to take 50+ years to get the current engines out of operation. I wonder if new engines are able to run without.

Yes, there are light aircraft that run on diesel.

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#48
post #42
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Was curious what their treatment was going to be regarding tin whiskers. Not much there (of course this is point in time inspection so it kind of makes sense) Did you read their specs? There's a small part about whiskers that already convey enough meaning: > UNACCEPTABLE WHISKER > A whisker is a slender needle-shaped metallic growth between a conductor and a land. Typically the result of mechanical stresses in high…

I did see that part, which is why I said 'not much' instead of 'nothing'. The issue with whiskers is that they grow over time (which is why I mentioned 'point in time'). I didn't see anything in there about solder alloy selection or any other mitigation.

Oh, so you mean you're interested in whiskers over time, not after manufacturing?

Sorry for the misunderstanding then.

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#49
post #34
post #8

Was curious what their treatment was going to be regarding tin whiskers. Not much there (of course this is point in time inspection so it kind of makes sense), but a quick google revealed quite a bit of study: https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/ I thought they were just one of those low probability items until a Sunday morning when I was running live audio for a church service. Singer was mid verse and BOOOOM! Huge boomin…

Use leaded solder and either inspect the joint for complete coverage or solder dip the part beforehand. Then, conformal coat the circuit card with sufficient thickness for tin whisker mitigation. Conformal coat really is the saving grace for tin whiskers. It's not perfect, a whisker can push through sometimes but then the whisker has to push back through the conformal coat again which is much harder.

Here is a picture that show how effective a solder dip can be https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/photos/pom/2004april.htm

About leaded solder and the environment: "Current alternatives are worse for the environment",page16 https://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker./reference/tech_papers/2011-ko...

Re: NASA's Through-Hole Workmanship Req (2002)

#50
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah. Damn. I hope nobody at NASA looks at some of the repairs I've had to make on my riding mower. I blame the work angles of some of those jobs...

If it makes you feel any better, I burned my hand pretty bad when mowing the lawn as a kid when my dad’s exhaust pipe repair fell off. No harm, no foul is what I mean to say, haha.

I had to fix the exhaust on this one too! This mower came with the property I bought this summer. You'd be hard pressed to find something less maintained than this mower. It was missing both exhaust bolts where the exhaust connects to the manifold. I had some left over "make-a-gasket" material so I used that and some old machine screws that I had available. Seriously, half of the exhaust was just banging around, exhaust leak city with it coming straight out of the manifold.
Post reply on HN