Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

foundation.mozilla.org

41–50 of 403 posts

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My impression was that IDFA was a concession provided by Apple a while ago when they restricted APIs to the stable device identifiers. The IDFA was an identifier that advertisers could use and could be controlled by the user, which was seen as a privacy improvement on advertisers just using the device serial number. I could be very much wrong, but this was my understanding.

That is correct. The IDFA is a compromise to get rid of older, more invasive tracking methods that ad networks used. Apple blocked access to the more sensitive data, and instead provided the IDFA which allows users to opt out, and limits the ability to combine data from different sources. Making the IDFA opt in is now a second, stronger step towards user privacy.

Yep. Before IDFA, apps had access to the device's UDID. In the past you could get it by using this code:

    [[UIDevice mainDevice] uniqueIdentifier]
It was deprecated in iOS 5. [1]

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/227590/unique-identifier...

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#42
post #19

As a reminder, most popular Android apps send data to Facebook : https://9to5google.com/2018/12/31/android-apps-facebook/

You can see a list of apps that share you activity with facebook here (even if you didn't install any facebook app on your phone or didn't use facebook login feature) : https://www.facebook.com/off_facebook_activity/activity_list (click "Manage Your Off-Facebook Activity" on the right if you're on desktop)

This requires a facebook account, though they likely do have data from those not registered.

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#43
post #25

Support Free software instead, and stop begging Apple for permission to control what happens on hardware you own.

What free software phones are there that actually take steps to prevent tracking? Most free software OSes I know about generally give apps lots of access to the system they are running on, which makes tracking a lot easier.

PinePhone, Libre phone to name two. I’m guessing there are some android ROMs that could do this as well but not positive

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#44
post #17

>Unfortunately, as you might imagine, a lot of advertisers, notably Facebook, were not happy with Apple. Facebook, which uses IDFA to track users’ activity across different apps and match them to advertising profiles, says that its advertising partners will be hit hard by this change. What about Google? Is Google also unhappy?

I would probably be happy if I were google. It's very, very unlikely they need IDFA to know whoever someone is so this gives them an edge over competition.

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#45
post #42
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can see a list of apps that share you activity with facebook here (even if you didn't install any facebook app on your phone or didn't use facebook login feature) : https://www.facebook.com/off_facebook_activity/activity_list (click "Manage Your Off-Facebook Activity" on the right if you're on desktop)

This requires a facebook account, though they likely do have data from those not registered.

They absolutely do, and it sucks that there's no way to view it or request deletion.

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#46

In Europe, cross-app, cross-browser & cross-device tracking is on very thin ice legally under the GDPR, so I'm not surprised Apple finally curbs the use of "sticky" identifiers on their devices. Honestly, it's a bit shameful that a device that is marketed as the gold standard in privacy would even support such an identifier in the first place, it has literally no purpose beyond mining peoples' data. Now that the thir…

The purpose of IDFA was to provide an identifier that wasn't hardwired to the device - apps were going to absurd lengths to get the UDID, and IDFA gave them something ostensibly sufficient that users could in theory reset at will.

I give good odds ad frameworks will again start trying to circumvent the platform security to get a UDID or equivalent.

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What free software phones are there that actually take steps to prevent tracking? Most free software OSes I know about generally give apps lots of access to the system they are running on, which makes tracking a lot easier.

PinePhone, Libre phone to name two. I’m guessing there are some android ROMs that could do this as well but not positive

What specific steps do they take to stop tracking?

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#48
I think removing the IDFA is great but .... most people probably login via the same IDs, either the same email address or facebook login, google login, github login, etc...

Once you've done that your app activity will be exchanged behind the scenes associating your data with your email or account so I'm not sure how many people this is going to really help.

IIRC Apple was trying to fix this hole too by having login via Apple give each app a different user IDs. Unfortunately that's not useful for the majority of people who need to be able to use non Apple devices.

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having been on both sides of the table, I would slightly disagree here. Fraud prevention for example will get an order of magnitude harder, plus this move will further skew the playing field towards FAANG who have the resources to puzzle the scraps back together for decent conversion tracking with the help of logins, IPs, SDKs with First Party IDs and a massive dose of machine learning.

I wonder if it would be profitable for Visa/Mastercard/Discover/AmEx to sell a verification service where people can authenticate with a $0.01 authorization or approval amount. Obviously, it wouldn't work with gift cards or other accounts not tied to a real person.

And make stolen credit card numbers even more valuable?

(I like where your head is at, fraud is just hard)

Re: Apple’s Anti-Tracking Plans for iPhone

#50
Say what you want about Apple but they are by far the most privacy focused big company. Their income is from selling physical devices. Typical megacorps in 2020 are leveraging economies of scale to sell their users' attention. Apple has a unique value add in that when their users benefit they benefit.

Sent from my Thinkpad.

Post reply on HN