Live data from Hacker News

Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

radicle.xyz

41–50 of 263 posts

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#43

What a nice funky design. That front page has a soul, unlike almost everything else I see nowadays.

Especially for a FOSS project! Usually they tend to go with a default theme with the most drab design. As an engineer, I sympathize with the effort needed to make it look good though.

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#44
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Actually, Gitlab and Gitea allows mirror of Github repos with Issues/wiki/PR etc. But GitHub does not mirror the issues/PRs from anyone, so it's a very one-sided connection.

That's problem of GitHub.

Yes, but that's a problem for the users which GitHub has every incentive to never solve. It is a problem of github and projects like radicle are a solution.

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You need internet for pull and push. I think(hoping) that they meant within a LAN it could work without internet.

(I'm not shooting the messenger here) If so, that would mean pushing/pulling within the LAN only... which Git supports already

If Github is unreachable, you don’t have a bugtracker, wiki etc. - you are working “blind”.

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#46
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Actually, Gitlab and Gitea allows mirror of Github repos with Issues/wiki/PR etc. But GitHub does not mirror the issues/PRs from anyone, so it's a very one-sided connection.

That's problem of GitHub.

And, by extension, all of its users.

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#47
post #20

i think this is technically interesting, but i'm curious in practice what it gives project maintainers over hosting their own gitlab instance or similar...

I guess for projects that run a risk of being shut down by RIAA or a government, this removes that single point of failure rather than moving it?

I can’t see the point for projects that don’t run this risk though.

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#48
post #8
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

you don't need to give your email to download the client no.

https://radicle.xyz/downloads.html

Not sure why they started the what practice, but you can see the download link in the website repo: https://github.com/radicle-dev/radicle.xyz/pull/145/files#di...

Specifically: mac https://releases.radicle.xyz/radicle-upstream-0.1.4.dmg Linux https://releases.radicle.xyz/radicle-upstream-0.1.4.AppImage

Release bucket listing https://releases.radicle.xyz/

Re: Radicle: A peer-to-peer alternative to GitHub

#49

"Work securely offline" Is... is that a problem with GitHub that stops you from doing that?

The design of GitHub means that your canonical upstream is only accessible through the internet, and so are your issues, PRs etc. If you're offline, you can't access it, and if GitHub is down, same story. Radicle, on the other hand, keeps all of this replicated locally, so push/pull works offline, and the code/social artifacts are replicated asynchronously, when you are online, but you don't need to be online to work…

How does push/pull work off line? That sounds impossible. Just scheduling a push doesn’t actually push anything. That’s like commuting to my local GitHub repo and having a scheduled push/pull every 10 minutes then?
Post reply on HN