Definitely these two: 1. Good writing is clear 4. Good writing is concise Use a simple, reduced vocabulary, as your readers are likely to have English as a second language (e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-44569277 ). And as Richard Feynman pointed out, try explaining it to a child. If you can't go back and rewrite it. Don't use (modern) slang, and avoid writing 'conversational' English. It's "lessons" not "lear…
This feedback presumes that all writing is intended for a specific, professional audience. Good writing is not limited to a single audience, and good writers will consider their audience when making choices. If a writer goes against the 'rules' you've just shared without much thought into whether or not they apply to their current goals... there is a problem. But there is likewise a problem in blindly following rules…
Steps to Improve Your Writing
41–50 of 76 posts
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#42Definitely these two: 1. Good writing is clear 4. Good writing is concise Use a simple, reduced vocabulary, as your readers are likely to have English as a second language (e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-44569277 ). And as Richard Feynman pointed out, try explaining it to a child. If you can't go back and rewrite it. Don't use (modern) slang, and avoid writing 'conversational' English. It's "lessons" not "lear…
English is my fourth language. I hate seeing advice like "use simple, reduced vocabulary". Dumbing everything down is not a way to go. Feynman said, that if you cannot explaind it to a child you do not understand it, not that you should communicate with everyone like they were kids.
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#43Definitely these two: 1. Good writing is clear 4. Good writing is concise Use a simple, reduced vocabulary, as your readers are likely to have English as a second language (e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-44569277 ). And as Richard Feynman pointed out, try explaining it to a child. If you can't go back and rewrite it. Don't use (modern) slang, and avoid writing 'conversational' English. It's "lessons" not "lear…
However, those sites have a captive audience: anyone smarter than the 'lowest common denominator' UK GOV target reader, any reader who might have appreciated a more concise and less 'hand-held' style, is going to keep reading anyway, because the information is important and non-negotiable.
Outside of that context, most pieces you might like to read were commissioned with maximum word-counts, varying levels of assumed readership skill and prior knowledge, and diverse other factors that defy any 'universal style-guide', such as TFA is trying to formulate.
For instance, I write about technology for a living. Those commissions have word-count restrictions that force me to either:
- Say less, so that I can maintain a level of English suitable for a moderately-skilled non-English speaker (As you can imagine, the editor does not want me to 'say less').
- Use more compressed and concise language that may be more challenging for the non-native reader (because concision can be antithetical to simplicity [and my editor also wants prose that is accessible to the widest number of readers without alienating the target demographic for that particular piece]).
- Write boldly and use footnotes and references to justify the claims I am making, because:
a) I don't have enough word-count for 'explainers' and 'box-outs'
b) I'm expected to deliver a lot of information, and
c) I'm expected to write in the simplest style available, depending on the intent of the commission.
It's bad enough that the dictates of SEO have dumbed down so much content from once-great news and analysis providers over the last ten years. Let's not support any further race to the bottom, but rather aim to write lean and information-rich material in a style that's matched to the readership.
[0] https://www.gov.uk/guidance/content-design/writing-for-gov-u...
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#44Definitely these two: 1. Good writing is clear 4. Good writing is concise Use a simple, reduced vocabulary, as your readers are likely to have English as a second language (e.g. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-44569277 ). And as Richard Feynman pointed out, try explaining it to a child. If you can't go back and rewrite it. Don't use (modern) slang, and avoid writing 'conversational' English. It's "lessons" not "lear…
Like many on HN, I admire the simplified language guidelines [0]that the UK GOV network of informational sites imposes on itself. A government has a civic duty to make regulatory and legal information as easy to understand as possible, for the widest gamut of possible readers who are subject to the laws of the land. However, those sites have a captive audience: anyone smarter than the 'lowest common denominator' UK G…
That's a good link and states what I was trying to say:
"""Good content is easy to read
Good online content is easy to read and understand.
It uses:
short sentences
sub-headed sections
simple vocabulary
This helps people find what they need quickly and absorb it effortlessly.The main purpose of GOV.UK is to provide information - there’s no excuse for putting unnecessarily complicated writing in the way of people’s understanding."""
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like many on HN, I admire the simplified language guidelines [0]that the UK GOV network of informational sites imposes on itself. A government has a civic duty to make regulatory and legal information as easy to understand as possible, for the widest gamut of possible readers who are subject to the laws of the land. However, those sites have a captive audience: anyone smarter than the 'lowest common denominator' UK G…
The word count is interesting. Presumably that's to approximately fill a "page", and provide a "familiar feel" to all articles on a site written by different authors? That's a good link and states what I was trying to say: """Good content is easy to read Good online content is easy to read and understand. It uses: short sentences sub-headed sections simple vocabulary This helps people find what they need quickly and…
No, a word count is dictated either by the fact that the article is intended for print as well as (or instead of) the web, or else the latest SEO voodoo rumor suggests that this month 2k word articles are doing better than 3k word articles.
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#46This is a good essay by Orwell, that's related.
"Politics and the English Language"
https://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_poli...
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm glad I'm more of a language descriptivist instead of prescriptivist because none of your examples bother me. >It's "lessons" not "learnings". How much have you eaten How many eatings have you had? Ugh. Does the word "drinks" also bother you? (As in "How many drinks have you had?" ) (My previous comment about that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17020434 ) And what about everybody including today's English P…
> Does the word "drinks" also bother you? No, but if you went to a pub and had several 'drinkings', then yes. "Learnings" is incorrect. > Does a language get to change and evolve at all? Yes, and despite my dislike for "learnings" it looks like it is here to stay unfortunately. It's "business English", amplified by the internet. When I tell friends and family about "learnings" their response is, to put it mildly, "wh…
Not arguing with you but genuinely asking a question because I'm an armchair linguist that wants to dissect what's truly bothering you...
Why is "learnings" incorrect but most of these other words ending in "-ings" acceptable? : https://www.thefreedictionary.com/words-that-end-in-ings#w10
In other words, what's the invisible rule that makes words like "readings" for "reading"/"read", "greetings" for "greeting"/"greet", etc not attract as much language policing?
Trivia.... Apparently "learnings" has been around since at least 1483 according to Oxford English Dictionary: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/118379/first-use...
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#48Hi everyone, OP here. Writing has always been a struggle for me. I just started to post consistently on this blog two weeks ago. Didn't expect this to get to the front page of HN. I hope you guys find it helpful. I'd appreciate any feedback or comment on the post! P.S: Fixed all the grammatical errors in the post.
Hey Adam, the content itself is great and the tips are bang on. However, I think you should proof read the article again. An article on 'Improving Your Writing' loses a lot of credibility when it has sentences like: > The character, 'hotel' has does an action 'wanted'. which should be: > The character, 'hotel', has an action, 'wanted'. It also seems like you rely on a single source, Williams and Colomb (1990). Is thi…
1. Fixed the mistake :) 2. Yes, totally recommend it. I've read a few books on writing and I think this is the best so far. The way the authors discuss the mechanics of writing is refreshing. It'll give you a good framework not just to write, but also to think. 3. This post encapsulates what I learned from the book and my experience to improve my writing skill.
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm glad I'm more of a language descriptivist instead of prescriptivist because none of your examples bother me. >It's "lessons" not "learnings". How much have you eaten How many eatings have you had? Ugh. Does the word "drinks" also bother you? (As in "How many drinks have you had?" ) (My previous comment about that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17020434 ) And what about everybody including today's English P…
> Does the word "drinks" also bother you? No, but if you went to a pub and had several 'drinkings', then yes. "Learnings" is incorrect. > Does a language get to change and evolve at all? Yes, and despite my dislike for "learnings" it looks like it is here to stay unfortunately. It's "business English", amplified by the internet. When I tell friends and family about "learnings" their response is, to put it mildly, "wh…
They are 'wrong' in that they aren't in the dictionary (yet). They are 'right' because they are correctly constructed by the rules.
I say that as a 'programmer' or 'coder' who does 'computing' on a 'computer'. I could be a 'painter' who does 'painting' (and produces a 'painting'!) Or a doctor who does doctoring. And on and on.
Re: Steps to Improve Your Writing
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
The word count is interesting. Presumably that's to approximately fill a "page", and provide a "familiar feel" to all articles on a site written by different authors? That's a good link and states what I was trying to say: """Good content is easy to read Good online content is easy to read and understand. It uses: short sentences sub-headed sections simple vocabulary This helps people find what they need quickly and…
> Presumably that's to approximately fill a "page", and provide a "familiar feel" to all articles on a site written by different authors? No, a word count is dictated either by the fact that the article is intended for print as well as (or instead of) the web, or else the latest SEO voodoo rumor suggests that this month 2k word articles are doing better than 3k word articles.
Is that really a thing? Sounds awful.