Is there an open source/open standards FPGA? Equivalent of what RISC-V is for processors so to speak?
AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
41–50 of 115 posts
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#42https://archive.is/016vq
https://www.wsj.com/articles/amd-is-in-advanced-talks-to-buy...
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#43Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#44Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#45Intel does not seem to have capitalized on the Altera acquisition but maybe that is also related to Intel's fab issues. From an operation perspective, this combines two non-overlapping TSMC customers that can potentially negotiate better wafer prices together. I assume that AMD has significantly higher wafer counts than Xilinx so this would primarily benefit the Xilinx business. From a technology perspective, this ac…
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#46This could work if AMD invested a ton in software like Intel has with OneAPI. But, if AMD really wants to get into a new market, it could try going into mobile. The 4000-series CPUs are great laptops CPUs which could go further down the scale, and over a couple generations maybe in phones too. Unlikely or stupid idea (RIP Broxton)? Still worth a shot, I feel.
Not my area of expertise, but I get the same feeling regarding their GPUs. Everything is built using CUDA, so AMD is out for ML/AI, etc.
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#47Has Altera done that well for Intel's bottom line? I haven't been watching that closely. I would love an RFSOC type peripheral though. Sort of a Spectrum Processing Unit or SPU. If you extrapolate the cu:Signal work to its logical extreme of a purpose built auxiliary processing unit the possibilities are pretty amazing. [1] https://github.com/rapidsai/cusignal
Altera is doing about the same before Intel's acquisition. Or may be losing to Xilinx a little ( within margin of error )
But one thing for certain is that it hasn't grow. ( At least on paper )
So it depends how you define well. Considering the performance of Intel's past acquisition ( Look at Infineon ) and the total failure of Intel Custom Foundry I think it is doing quite well.
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#48This could just be a strategic acquisition for internal purposes: I bet a lot of design and architecture validation is done on big FPGAs. Maybe they wanted some custom ones?
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#49Feels like a datacenter play for specialized compute. Given AMDs domination of server workloads in $/performance, seems like doubling down on that advantage. FPGA is already used today to offload SSL termination from the CPU.
AMD really needs to focus on software if they want to catch Nvidia though.
Re: AMD Is in Advanced Talks to Buy Xilinx
#50But things has changed since 2016 - 2018. I used to see the move to FPGA as going offensive attack in the server space, now both AMD, and Intel are doing what ever they can to fence off ARM.