Live data from Hacker News

Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

insecam.org

41–48 of 48 posts

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#41

While this kind of content is not unprecedented (think Shodan.io), I haven't seen a browser with full previews like this.. Nice!! Good official public webcams are pretty rare so this will be useful to look around the world.

I don't think these are official public webcams. At least, that's how I interpret their FAQ: https://www.insecam.org/en/faq/

I recognize one in Austin as being the "official UT tower cam": https://www.universitycoop.com/tower-cam

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#42

I guess we can conclude Axis cameras are not secure

No, you can conclude that Axis cameras are by far the market leader in the IP CCTV space.

How are these cameras hacked then? It's a choice by the user(some setup)?

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#43

While this kind of content is not unprecedented (think Shodan.io), I haven't seen a browser with full previews like this.. Nice!! Good official public webcams are pretty rare so this will be useful to look around the world.

I don't think these are official public webcams. At least, that's how I interpret their FAQ: https://www.insecam.org/en/faq/

I know, that's what I meant, official webcams are rare to find, so it's nice to have some more coverage this way, unofficial of course.

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#44
post #3

Sitting in a cold office in Denmark, I miss travelling to places like this: https://www.insecam.org/en/view/238958/

I'd love to visit your cold office, because here it's 37° C, very humid, and it's still a week away from the dog days of summer. Air conditioning can only do so much in this humidity.

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#45

Years ago there was a Mac screensaver that showed a random insecure camera feed each time it activated. Lots of dark roads and driveways, but weirdly fascinating all the same. Don’t think it’s working any more - maybe this could be the base for a new one.

Oh man, using that at work could backfire soooo badly :)

Imagine someone forgetting to protect the security cams of their meth lab or brothel.

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#46
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think these are official public webcams. At least, that's how I interpret their FAQ: https://www.insecam.org/en/faq/

Some of the cameras near me are clearly pointed at scenery. I won't presume anything about why they are pointed at scenery and insecure; but I also won't presume that they are intended to remain private.

Still, I'm surprised they pretty much all have such miserable quality.

I used to have one overlooking the river in my mother's house. I spent a lot of time tuning it so it looked really great, both day and night (at night using really long exposure times). I used high quality webcams at first and then the 5MP raspberry cam (later modded with a better lens).

But even the "1080p" security cams that cost $200 or more have horrible quality compared to those. They're good for security purposes yes, but I wouldn't use them to advertise the views from a hotel.

I really wish there were some really HQ webcams around the world, think 4K or even 8K (so you could zoom in even on a 4K screen), with good night performance, it would be so great to really get a feel for a city. These cams are just so poor.

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#47

This is both fascinating and creepy at the same time .. While i enjoy seeing Torino beach video (submitted by another HN'er). Felt creepy seeing this :( https://www.insecam.org/en/view/833447/ Looks like a call center of sorts , essentially an IT company , not keeping their shit secure :(

Looks like the traffic here has alerted them ;) It's gone now.

Re: Insecam: Directory of Unsecured Surveillance Cameras

#48
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some of the cameras near me are clearly pointed at scenery. I won't presume anything about why they are pointed at scenery and insecure; but I also won't presume that they are intended to remain private.

Still, I'm surprised they pretty much all have such miserable quality. I used to have one overlooking the river in my mother's house. I spent a lot of time tuning it so it looked really great, both day and night (at night using really long exposure times). I used high quality webcams at first and then the 5MP raspberry cam (later modded with a better lens). But even the "1080p" security cams that cost $200 or more ha…

I live in a well-known vacation spot.

One camera pointed at a ski slope. (The location was wrong.) For all I know, it could be on some ski slope's web page under "current conditions."

Other cameras have ocean or downtown views.

Post reply on HN