Live data from Hacker News

Computational Music Synthesis

cs.gmu.edu

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: Computational Music Synthesis

#41
post #14

This seems nice, introductory and very up-to-date. If I may offer some superficial criticism, I found the covered material was at odds with the title. The title evokes themes of algorithmic composition and experimental whole-music generation, while the book is actually about digital synthesizers and effects on a digital signal processing level. Of course I'm having a hard time coming up with anything better, but mayb…

My first thought was the same. Swapping "music" for "audio" would probably work. On a side note is generative music even music? (I think it can be but) According to my undergrad music prof the answer would be no, it would be classified as "not music", same as bird song. I've since seen research that refutes her birdsong claim (she wrote extensively on it) but I'm curious what the general consensus is?

A lot of modern electronic music actually has generative elements in it. Granular synthesis is very often random-based, though it's more in between an audio effect and generative. Especially in modular synthesis there exist very advanced and interesting arpeggiator modules. I know for a fact that these techniques are used during certain psy-trance livesets (forest psy, among other things).

I mean you still could argue it's not music, but I bet the audience on the dance floor disagrees.

Re: Computational Music Synthesis

#42
post #4

Thanks for submitting this! Sounds really great and I’m excited to read through this. The theory of FFTs, equalizers, etc is sometimes really unapproachable because of the dense mathematics, it’s much easier for me to comprehend algorithms and concepts as code.

I wonder, has anyone written a formula-to-pseudocode translator? Seems like it should be possible if you have access to the formula markup language.
Post reply on HN