Live data from Hacker News

Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

nimbleindustries.io

41–50 of 149 posts

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#41

There's already one news on front page https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23675864 Can we merge them? Mods

> There's already one news on front page

And the comment that is currently at/near the top and mostly discussed happens to link to exactly this site.

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#43
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not counting the redesign, there haven't been "sparkly" features. Sparkly features are the kinds of things the old management used to let engineers have free reign to implement. Github pre-Microsoft was rudderless. They were more prone to implementing silly 3d model diff tools and things instead of supporting enterprise features or building powerful CI/CD tools and automation. New Github is on the right track.

- Personal Status - Round Avatars (all catgirl ears are now cut off) - Collapsing of some similar messages on the Dashboard into one (i missed some things because of this) - Not just one, but several redesigns (im old) - The whole "marketplace" functionality (imitation of an app store) - The "explore" and "trending" functionality (i see this like a Facebook feed) Not sure about others, but i used GitHub as a git host…

> (a bunch of comments about the UX redesign)

I agree. I'll add one: README files with tables now require horizontal scrolling, and that's utterly disappointing.

> The "explore" and "trending" functionality

I do work in ML and computer vision, and this is how I discover all of the new models and code people are using. It's awesome.

> Not sure about others, but i used GitHub as a git host and issue/MR tracker. All the other stuff is just distraction in my eyes.

You're missing out! Deploying code is so easy once you're using CI/CD. Github actions are powerful.

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#44
post #19
post #14

It's easy to see from the uptime history [1] that there have been many more incidents in April-June than in January-April. Don't know if that has anything to do with the Microsoft acquisition, but it is concerning. [1] https://www.githubstatus.com/uptime?page=1

Wow, that's stark. I count 6 in April-June (2 major outages) and only 1 in January-March (0 major outages. I wonder if COVID has affected this somehow. Anecdotally I've heard of at least one other ~peer company with a large rise in incidents/outages since April. Strange since both companies previously had a strong culture of remote work (maybe 1/4 to 1/3 of eng was remote) going into the pandemic, so I'd be quite sur…

If GitHub's been migrating to Azure infrastructure on the backend, it's possible that everyone else moving to all-WfH helped to cause it. Teams use massively increased during lockdown for obvious reasons and that's definitely Azure-based. If Teams managed to overload Azure capacity, I could see that having knock-on effects on GitHub.

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#45
post #8

Ironically, Firefox tells me to stay away from your website. Which, I will. update: the website is back and well now from my end.

I can't reproduce, would you mind emailing me a screenshot of this? (I'm the author) colin at any of the domains in my bio.

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#47

Has nimbleindustries.io been down more since Github's acquisition by Microsoft?

Yes

I think it's pretty fair to say we've all been pretty down since GitHub's acquisition by Microsoft.

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#48
post #25

What I don't get is how they can be down for hours on end. If I make a deploy that turns out to be buggy, I'll roll my site back to a stable previous version within minutes. Sure, that's not always possible if I've made incompatible database schema changes, but in my experience those are very, very rare (i.e. I almost always add db columns, and only rarely delete or rename columns - and when I do, I do so after those…

I'm sure these down times are more about infrastructure problems than just database updates and I'm also sure that this infrastructure is a little more complexe than your site.

I'm sure their deployment process is way more complex than mine. I'm also sure that unlike me, they have engineers dedicated to managing the complexity. GitHub is a company that has blogged about how easy they have made deployment and how they deploy many times a day. I don't believe there are any compelling reasons why that ease of deployment shouldn't also extend to re-deploying previous versions of their service, so they don't need to leave a bad version up for hours.

Re: Has GitHub been down more since its acquisition by Microsoft?

#50
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- Personal Status - Round Avatars (all catgirl ears are now cut off) - Collapsing of some similar messages on the Dashboard into one (i missed some things because of this) - Not just one, but several redesigns (im old) - The whole "marketplace" functionality (imitation of an app store) - The "explore" and "trending" functionality (i see this like a Facebook feed) Not sure about others, but i used GitHub as a git host…

> (a bunch of comments about the UX redesign) I agree. I'll add one: README files with tables now require horizontal scrolling, and that's utterly disappointing. > The "explore" and "trending" functionality I do work in ML and computer vision, and this is how I discover all of the new models and code people are using. It's awesome. > Not sure about others, but i used GitHub as a git host and issue/MR tracker. All the…

Many of my projects have a fixed scope and thus are 'done' at some point. If you develop like this, CI/CD is rarely worth the effort. Its better suited for projects that suffer from scope creep or regular upstream breakages.
Post reply on HN