Live data from Hacker News

Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

arstechnica.com

41–50 of 166 posts

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#41

But Facebook, Google, Microsoft, et al are still free to sell phone location data acquired through apps (or Android itself in the case of Google), right? I wonder if there is any hope of laws to limit the ability of companies to sell this data...

IIRC, Google doesn't sell your personal location data: https://safety.google/privacy/ads-and-data/ Disclaimer: I work at Google.

Transferring data between departments costs approximately $0.

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How did you get from “mobile company providing location data” to “law enforcement use of stingrays to obtain location data”?

Not much of a difference really. Mainly just that LE uses their own equipment instead of that of the carrier. This brings up a separate FCC issue: Why is it okay for LE to transmit on the cellular bands for this purpose, when it provably can interfere with emergency communications (such as a 911 call)?

It’s a huge difference. The technical difference is that law enforcement is doing an end-run around the carrier to have phones just give up information. Carriers have zero control over that.

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So this Supreme Court ruling has eliminated all use of Stingray-like equipment by all law enforcement agencies unless they have a warrant? Wow! Looks like Harris will be going of business soon, and no more DRT boxes flying over cities?

Why are you being downvoted for pointing out mass surveillance and extremely targeted surveillance are both still legal and frequently used.

As you pick up on, the question was just used to make a statement, not gain information. That could be considered bad-faithy. But at the very least it annoys with its overused tone of sarcastic outrage, especially because it was the second such comment in the thread, made after the first was already shown to be entirely wrong.

On its merits, the accusation of hypocrisy is also a non-sequitur: from "one bad thing is stopped" never follows "all bad things are stopped". The implied expectation is impossible to fulfill.

It's also unhelpful, politically, in a way that this thread, HN generally, or even "the internet" are full of: If everyone is always assuming the worst while expecting the best, it removes all incentives for anyone in power to behave honorably. After all, if you're going to be accused to be corrupt and/or incompetent anyway, why even try?

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#44
post #35

I'll celebrate when the money from the fines is actually sitting in the Treasury account, and not a moment before. Pai is outrageously corrupt, is best friends with telecom CEOs, and with near-certainty will cave to requests to have these punishments reduced to next-to-nothing.

Yes. Particularly given that Pai's FCC has developed a bit of a habit of levying fines and then not bothering to actually collect them.

More info about this?

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#45

But Facebook, Google, Microsoft, et al are still free to sell phone location data acquired through apps (or Android itself in the case of Google), right? I wonder if there is any hope of laws to limit the ability of companies to sell this data...

It's time to differentiate selling "Bob is in Location X" from "Show this ad to all people at location X". The first case is a far far bigger privacy concern to me, and seems to be what mobile networks were doing. Facebook, Google, and Microsoft are doing the latter.

If you click on the ad or run its JavaScript, it has your device info matching the ad geofence

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IIRC, Google doesn't sell your personal location data: https://safety.google/privacy/ads-and-data/ Disclaimer: I work at Google.

Do they refuse warrantless requests?

https://support.google.com/transparencyreport/answer/7381738...

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#48

But Facebook, Google, Microsoft, et al are still free to sell phone location data acquired through apps (or Android itself in the case of Google), right? I wonder if there is any hope of laws to limit the ability of companies to sell this data...

It's time to differentiate selling "Bob is in Location X" from "Show this ad to all people at location X". The first case is a far far bigger privacy concern to me, and seems to be what mobile networks were doing. Facebook, Google, and Microsoft are doing the latter.

+1. I care way more about the existence of an api that tells anyone with money exactly where I am (and where I've been) than I do about one that anonymously attributes (in aggregate) my ad interaction stats to some place I was at or interested in.

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#49
Presumably this only happened because the :

> lawmakers in November accused[1] the FCC of failing to protect consumers’ privacy, and said that major wireless carriers were disclosing real-time location to data compilers without consumers’ consent or knowledge. The information could be obtained by companies including bounty hunters, the lawmakers said in a letter.

> [1]: https://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/democrats.energycomme...

> -- as reported by Bloomburg

> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-01-31/wireless-...

The FCC really has become just a lobbying goat under Pai. Yikes.

Re: Carrier sales of phone-location data is illegal, FCC plans punishment

#50
post #12

Toothless fines. Indict corporate officers or employees that did it... then you’ll get change.

Depends on the size of the fine. GDPR fines theoretically hit plenty hard.

I think income-based fines are illegal under ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ though, in the United States, (not a lawyer), so maybe that won’t fly.

Post reply on HN