Please don’t editorialize titles, four out of five times the editorialized title is strictly worse, and often it’s straight up wrong , like in this case. If you don’t like the original title due to omission of info, you can at least use the HTML title: > wikiHow’s art is made by a global network of freelancers, primarily in the Philippines. (Emphasis mine.)
OP's headline saves you a click, versus the original title: "We Finally Figured Out Who Makes wikiHow’s Bizarre Art"
WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
41–50 of 101 posts
Re: WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see how the current title isn't factual
I guess isn’t doing its job, so let me temporarily break the guidelines: “GLOBAL network of freelancers, PRIMARILY in the Philippines” != “an army of freelancers in the Philippines”.
Shock. Awe.
Re: WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it always Medium that's blamed for this but not mainstream news websites? I'm pretty sure I've been paywalled by sites like NYT yet people keep posting links to them.
Because Medium doesn’t author anything. It’s as if NYT consisted of nothing but “letters to the editor” (without an editor and not in response to anything that was previously published, because they would be publishing nothing in the equivalent scenario) and then decided to put up a paywall. There are countless free (and even ad-free) text-only hosting options available. Medium provides nothing of value to me as a co…
The value is that it's providing a platform to authors who want a platform where they know they'll get readers. I personally don't choose to use Medium anymore, but it's very easy to get people to read your content on there. In the past I've used places like Wordpress, Blogger, my own webpages, etc., and it took a lot more effort to get people to see your content. Whereas on Medium, it didn't take long to get people to look at my content. Few things I wrote went into a black hole.
> I say this as someone that pays for about a dozen online newspaper/magazine subscriptions but will never pay a penny to access a site like Medium or Scribd or Quora or any other site that does nothing but make money off being the middle man.
They make money by being a platform to voices you might not otherwise hear because newspapers and magazines pick and choose a small set of authors to write most of their content. If that's not your cup of tea, then it's not your cup of tea.
I choose not to use Medium as an author, but I understand why people choose to publish on it and why some people would choose to pay for it.
> Anyway, it’s all moot as Medium will inevitably shutter or pivot.
Like every other business conceivably?
> If those views are killed off by requiring a paywall, then Medium itself becomes defunct.
Is that actually happening?
Re: WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
OP's headline saves you a click, versus the original title: "We Finally Figured Out Who Makes wikiHow’s Bizarre Art"
Saves more than a click because it requires you to sign in to read the article.
That being said, that action does require an extra click.
Re: WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it always Medium that's blamed for this but not mainstream news websites? I'm pretty sure I've been paywalled by sites like NYT yet people keep posting links to them.
Because Medium used to promise it would never do this. https://www.niemanlab.org/2019/03/the-long-complicated-and-e...
Re: WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
#46Re: WikiHow’s art is made by a network of freelancers, mostly in the Philippines
#47> wikiHow instructed these freelancers on how “to create the most instructive visuals for every step of every article.” Hopefully written and illustrated in genuine wikihow style