Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
41–50 of 63 posts
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#42> if NASA wanted to send control signals like transmit on and off, they’d need to run a whole parallel set of wires, which would be expensive. So, they came up with a solution: use the same lines for control signals as well! It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today. Maybe I have rose tinted glasses, but the level of creativity and cle…
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#43> if NASA wanted to send control signals like transmit on and off, they’d need to run a whole parallel set of wires, which would be expensive. So, they came up with a solution: use the same lines for control signals as well! It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today. Maybe I have rose tinted glasses, but the level of creativity and cle…
If there is a more effortless way to do it, it will be done this way. It's getting interesting when there is no such way because the problem is at the edge of our current capabilities. If I wanted to search for ingenuity and creative solutions, I would start at the cutting edge or maybe even moonshot projects.
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#44> if NASA wanted to send control signals like transmit on and off, they’d need to run a whole parallel set of wires, which would be expensive. So, they came up with a solution: use the same lines for control signals as well! It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today. Maybe I have rose tinted glasses, but the level of creativity and cle…
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#45> if NASA wanted to send control signals like transmit on and off, they’d need to run a whole parallel set of wires, which would be expensive. So, they came up with a solution: use the same lines for control signals as well! It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today. Maybe I have rose tinted glasses, but the level of creativity and cle…
It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today.
I think that's the wrong way to look at it. There are a few factors at play here. One is selection bias (there was a lot of crap written then too).More importantly though, "ingenuity" is somewhat a limited resource. If your systems are highly constraining, you burn a lot of it on working around the constraints. It can be clever as hell, but also means a lot of other stuff couldn't be done.
Also, there are vastly more people working in the area now, with the corresponding regression to the mean.
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#46Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#47> if NASA wanted to send control signals like transmit on and off, they’d need to run a whole parallel set of wires, which would be expensive. So, they came up with a solution: use the same lines for control signals as well! It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today. Maybe I have rose tinted glasses, but the level of creativity and cle…
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Didnt some guy figure out how to get free phone calls using a cheap whistle from a cereal box :-)
The book "Exploding The Phone" goes into all of these stories and much more. If you ever wanted to know about how and why the analog phone system was so hackable/phreakable, this book is for you. [0] http://explodingthephone.com/
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#49> if NASA wanted to send control signals like transmit on and off, they’d need to run a whole parallel set of wires, which would be expensive. So, they came up with a solution: use the same lines for control signals as well! It really seems that in earlier years, when resources were limited, people really used their ingenuity far better than today. Maybe I have rose tinted glasses, but the level of creativity and cle…
So our cleverness is inside the applications, getting stuff at the top of the stack to do things it wasn't intended to do by combining relatively high-level pieces. I've done that, I'm sure a lot of us here have done that.
Re: Quindar Tones: the beeps heard in recordings of astronauts in space
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Inband vs out-of-band signalling is one of those great debates in telecoms. You can see it in RS232 as well, with "XON/XOFF" characters versus "RTS/CTS" extra signalling lines. Most internet protocols are "in-band", but there are two big exceptions in FTP and SIP, which is very much an internet protocol designed by phone people.
> SIP, which is very much an internet protocol designed by phone people. Allegedly SIP is much better than the ITU's H.32x standards, and if that is true, then H.32X has to be an unspeakable horror.
The reason why H.323 is “unspeakable horror” to internet people is mostly about it being built on top of existing practice of telco signaling, so: global titles instead of URIs and ASN.1 PER instead of HTTP-style (in case of SIP arguably overly verbose and complex) text messages.
Edit: and IIRC there is significant user experience difference caused by that: H.323 supports the traditional telco style Initial address/Subsequent address/Address complete dialing, while SIP works in terms of complete SIP URIs and the user terminal has to somehow divine that the dialed number is complete.