i say this with respect and humility, but i am very surprised at the naivete with which John addressed the subject of AGI. he is so casual about it -- not only the idea of working on it but also the idea of it existing at all. he seems oblivious to the gravity of that discovery. it is not just "very valuable," it will be earth shattering and probably wipe out humanity. and its his side-project. and his son will help…
John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
41–50 of 930 posts
Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#42Progress in AI is due to data and computational power advances. I wonder what kind of advances are needed for AGI. 1. Biological brains are non-differentiable spiking networks much more complicated than backpropagated ANNs. 2. Ion channels may or may not be affected by quantum effects. 3. The search space is huge (but organisms aren't optimal and natural selection is probably local search) 4. If it took ~3.8b years t…
Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#43Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#44Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#45i say this with respect and humility, but i am very surprised at the naivete with which John addressed the subject of AGI. he is so casual about it -- not only the idea of working on it but also the idea of it existing at all. he seems oblivious to the gravity of that discovery. it is not just "very valuable," it will be earth shattering and probably wipe out humanity. and its his side-project. and his son will help…
Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#46Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#47I hope he'll go the hybrid symbolic and neural network way (causal and statistical), instead of just statistical. AGI needs a type system... I hope I'll achieve AGI before him but it's nice to know there's some real competition! (because, reader, there are almost 0 researchers seriously trying to achieve AGI in a not totally bullshit way. Only opencog and Cyc comes to mind).
You forgot "he who shall not be named"... /ok, maybe his project falls under "total bullshit"...
Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#48We've gone back into the part of the cycle where VR is an odd curiousity again, haven't we?
Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#49I think we just got 50% closer to making AGI happen.
Re: John Carmack: I’m going to work on artificial general intelligence
#50I don't understand how he could contribute to the field of AGI research from home, by himself, and maybe with his son. It's the kind of problem that requires incredible amounts of data, hardware, and theory to make any progress. Wouldn't it make more sense for him to join a cutting-edge team, like DeepMind or OpenAI?