41–50 of 249 posts
Jeeze and I can't get my pytorch to stop leaking memory. I couldn't imagine trying to drive a car with it
His team is hiring; https://www.tesla.com/careers/job/software-engineerdeeplearn... https://www.tesla.com/careers/job/machine-learninginfrastruc... https://www.tesla.com/careers/job/machine-learningscientista...
lol i just did the interview and failed. had to find shortest path between tesla chargers. all in C++. completed it but failed
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your comments read like /r/RealTesla | TSLAQ fud. Please explain, in detail, what your specific objections are, and how you are more qualified on this subject matter than the presenter.
I am honestly scared even of WayMo that I think unless NHTSA gets its acts together this shit shouldn't be allowed on roads. It's often reactionary - people wait for someone to die and then suddenly you have nervous Musk in front of Congress and such crap. Why wait? Why can't these be regulated before allowing on roads? And no, failover control is not acceptable given the past incidents and deaths.
Meanwhile Waymo is way ahead.
Do you belittle everyone that gets second place in the Olympics because the winner is "way ahead"? Your comment just reeks of anger and hostility. It seems like you'd rather Tesla didn't try at all, and instead we all just give up and go back to the status quo.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am honestly scared even of WayMo that I think unless NHTSA gets its acts together this shit shouldn't be allowed on roads. It's often reactionary - people wait for someone to die and then suddenly you have nervous Musk in front of Congress and such crap. Why wait? Why can't these be regulated before allowing on roads? And no, failover control is not acceptable given the past incidents and deaths.
You seem to use "regulated" as in "forbidden" right now, but maybe I am misreading so can you elaborate? Today thousands are dying every year on the road, are we just forbidding cars entirely? > And no, failover control is not acceptable given the past incidents and deaths. How many incidents/deaths per miles driven? How does it compare to all the other transportation systems?
“Perhaps that’s because, as it turns out, Teslas on Autopilot could have a higher fatal accident rate than those driven entirely by humans.”
Just listening to this talk scares me. The amount of errors - even in a seemingly normal, sunny day - is mind boggling to think people trust this crap. How can we rely on the output of eight cameras? This is not a kid's science project. It's all fancy neural networks until someone dies. Pretty callous and Silicon valley-mindset for such an important and critical function of the car. Will never buy a Tesla after havin…
> mind boggling to think people trust this crap It's also mind boggling to think we currently trust organic tissue to do this crap, some of which is bathed in psychoactive chemicals. And yet we do, and as a result, horrendous catastrophes occur every minute of every day. > It's all fancy neural networks until someone dies No, that can't be the standard, not when people are dying right now in the current regime. Unles…
The appropriate standard for self-driving cars is a sober professional driver, not the average idiot on Saturday night. It isn't unusual for a driver to go a million miles without an accident, when that's their job.
Anyone knows why Andrej's team chooses PyTorch (as oppose to say TensorFlow?)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am honestly scared even of WayMo that I think unless NHTSA gets its acts together this shit shouldn't be allowed on roads. It's often reactionary - people wait for someone to die and then suddenly you have nervous Musk in front of Congress and such crap. Why wait? Why can't these be regulated before allowing on roads? And no, failover control is not acceptable given the past incidents and deaths.
You seem to use "regulated" as in "forbidden" right now, but maybe I am misreading so can you elaborate? Today thousands are dying every year on the road, are we just forbidding cars entirely? > And no, failover control is not acceptable given the past incidents and deaths. How many incidents/deaths per miles driven? How does it compare to all the other transportation systems?
Professional drivers can go for a million miles without an accident, and I don't believe anyone's autonomous driving software can get within an order of magnitude of that without a disengagement, even in favorable conditions.
You may disagree that a disengagement is equivalent to a human having an accident, but I strongly feel that it is. In either case, you have a situation where the driver reached a point where it was definitively unable to determine an appropriate next action.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> mind boggling to think people trust this crap It's also mind boggling to think we currently trust organic tissue to do this crap, some of which is bathed in psychoactive chemicals. And yet we do, and as a result, horrendous catastrophes occur every minute of every day. > It's all fancy neural networks until someone dies No, that can't be the standard, not when people are dying right now in the current regime. Unles…
"It's also mind boggling to think we currently trust organic tissue to do this crap, some of which is bathed in psychoactive chemicals." The appropriate standard for self-driving cars is a sober professional driver, not the average idiot on Saturday night. It isn't unusual for a driver to go a million miles without an accident, when that's their job.
Numbers are numbers.