Live data from Hacker News

No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

sellercentral.amazon.com

41–50 of 508 posts

Re: No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

#41
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bad for the environment as well for trans-pacific shipping to be cheaper

Aren't ocean vessels one of the most efficient forms of transportation in existence?

Once the packages reach a domestic port, they still have to compete the same domestic journey as a local package.

Re: No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

#42
post #4

If the Trump administration had just opened with this, I think we might have saved ourselves a lot of stock market turbulence with tariff pissing contests. U. S. sellers start in the hole by the fact that they can't even compete on shipping prices with Chinese companies. It reminds me of the Shell gas station owner I worked for many decades ago who complained that the local drugstore could sell quarts of oil cheaper…

Your drugstore/gas-station anecdote doesn't quite apply here though. The ePacket delivery option comes with size, weight and cost limitations such that it's not useful for shipping retail quantities. It's almost exclusively used for suppliers in China to ship directly to end-customers.

Re: No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

#43
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does this mean lower government spending? Kind of blows my mind the government gets tax money and private people get the benefits.

Huh? I'm not sure what this has to do with taxes or government spending. The USPS doesn't get tax money; it's financed by its customers, like any other business, it just happens to be wholly owned by the federal government. Postal rates are high because they're forced by the UPU agreement to deliver Chinese mail for almost nothing, so they pass the costs on to US customers.

What is the UPU and how'd they get this power?

Re: No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

#45

This is one way to mitigate knock off products from China. If the shipping costs come up to the norm, they won't always (if ever) be the cheapest product so the real one will win out more often. Various products will have different tipping points where it just doesn't make sense to ship and/or they aren't getting enough sales to justify it. Personally, I like it and it seems like everyone wins.. except people who und…

Rather a lot of name brand stuff is also getting shipped from China.

Re: No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

#46
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bad for the environment as well for trans-pacific shipping to be cheaper

Aren't ocean vessels one of the most efficient forms of transportation in existence?

I don't know about that, I'm unqualified to answer. However, ocean liners do use very dirty fuels (compared to automobiles) and very dirty engines with respect to sulfur and nitrogen oxides emissions

Re: No More Cheap Shipping for Chinese Sellers

#50
post #5

This actually sounds like a good thing. It costs Chinese shippers almost nothing to send stuff directly from China, while it costs me quite a lot to send stuff within the US, largely because I'm subsidizing all the Chinese shippers. Moreover, for me to send any parcel (even very small ones, like 2 oz.) outside the US costs a small fortune these days, again because I'm subsidizing the Chinese shippers.

being a buyer off ebay what always surprised me is the next to nothing if not free shipping from China. It is good to see it changing as an article from 2014 [1] indicated how the USPS is getting soaked for the shipping on our side of the ocean.

if this is fallout from the trade issues it honestly is the only good outcome of them

[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2014/09/12/...

Post reply on HN