Live data from Hacker News

GitHub and Trade Controls

help.github.com

41–50 of 73 posts

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#41

“GitHub.com may not be used for purposes prohibited under applicable export control laws, including purposes related to the development, production, or use of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons or long range missiles or unmanned aerial vehicles.“ So anybody developing any kind of drone and hosting on github is breaking the law?

Basically yes.

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#42

How feasible is for Github to create an EU organization, which is effectively mirror of github.com? So all commits, issues,... are cloned in both. But .eu usage is not governed by US law. Also, repos can be blacklisted from .com/.eu based on rules.

Svalbard has zero VAT and expenditure taxes, natural cooling and very few trading sanctions.

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#43
post #10

That's a good reminder that, given the slight deterioration of the USA strategic/diplomatic stability in the past few years, using any US-based services without a strictly non-US backup is like playing poker. And it happens we're a lot to play poker here.

ITAR has been in place for decades...

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#44

How feasible is for Github to create an EU organization, which is effectively mirror of github.com? So all commits, issues,... are cloned in both. But .eu usage is not governed by US law. Also, repos can be blacklisted from .com/.eu based on rules.

Svalbard has zero VAT and expenditure taxes, natural cooling and very few trading sanctions.

Its part of Norway...

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#45
post #41

“GitHub.com may not be used for purposes prohibited under applicable export control laws, including purposes related to the development, production, or use of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons or long range missiles or unmanned aerial vehicles.“ So anybody developing any kind of drone and hosting on github is breaking the law?

Basically yes.

That was a rhetorical question. But, yeah, wow.

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#46
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Svalbard has zero VAT and expenditure taxes, natural cooling and very few trading sanctions.

Its part of Norway...

Different tax and customs jurisdiction from mainland Norway. No Norwegian government services apart from postal reach Svalbard.

Mainland Norway, in contrast, has very high taxes...

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#47
post #8
post #4

> Travel in these regions may impact your account status,... ?!?@!

I believe Slack did this too; if you've ever signed-in to Slack within a country that is currently restricted, your account was just deleted without warning.

Except GitHub seems to be handling it a lot more professionally. A clearer written policy and process for appeals - as opposed to Slack that did a behind the scenes change and borked a bunch of accounts.

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#48
post #4

> Travel in these regions may impact your account status,... ?!?@!

When you give every company a log of your rough location, it's not surprising they'll find ways to abuse it contrary to your interests. Information can't be used to hassle you if you're not leaking it in the first place. We're at the point where it's just basic laziness to not be using a VPN that decouples your network access address from what webservices see.

If you travel to a Forbidden Zone, find they block wireguard, and don't have time to set up obfsproxy, that's a much more straightforwardly manageable outcome than being arbitrarily messed with after your return.

Re: GitHub and Trade Controls

#50
post #5

These rules are so stupid and actually hurts no one but the poor individual developer, a few years ago I used to live in Syria before the events. I had to find 3rd party mirrors or VPNs for the stupidest shit... like Nvidia graphics driver, adobe flash player, Java runtime and silly stuff like that, some ISPs had public download pages where you can find these general utilities most of it was outdated but does the job…

> I guess the US is afraid that terrorists may develop weapons using Adobe flash player xD

This is a glib take on US sanctions regardless of whether you feel US sanctions are appropriate. Sanctions are just a weapon, they're not supposed to specifically ban things that are useful to terrorists. It doesn't matter if terrorists use Adobe flash player or not. What matters is that the bans make life worse for Syrian people and their government. Clearly, it's working, because even savvy Syrian developers have to scramble to find illegal/unofficial 3rd party mirrors and VPNs to access basic downloads which, even if it "does the job", can be severely outdated. Enough of a problem that you're coming to this forum and complaining about it.

Post reply on HN