Earlier quoted context omitted.
Your post is interesting but it misses a key point: Selection bias is everywhere, but in the US and most other countries you do not get run over by a truck if you watch Fox News, run your own blog or decide to make fun of politicians.
Yes. It's a long, well thought out post that's entirely non-sequitur. The poster doesn't understand the difference between true propaganda and spin. The NYTimes has its own opinion, but it is definitely not an instrument of the US Government. He also implies that because China has clunky methods which are obvious they don't have any subtle ones. Having clunky methods doesn't rule out having subtle ones. I don't speak…
I am genuinely interested, how did you establish that you have the ability to correctly compensate for your biases?