Earlier quoted context omitted.
This has been the case since the dawn of spaceflight. Iridium flares in particular have been noticeable even in daytime. Far less of a problem than airplane lights let alone city lights for the enjoyment of the night sky. The ISS is MUCH larger and brighter.
This is tired logic. The fact remains that if I go out and look up in the sky and see moving lights, I'm going to be annoyed. Airplane, satellite, whatever, it's not a good experience and it is absolutely a problem still regardless of the comparison to other problems. However someone said it would be rare. As long as I don't look up and see non-natural moving lights in the sky I'm cool with it.
Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
41–47 of 47 posts
Re: Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
#42is this what its always going to look like when we have 12000 of the things in the sky? Astronomers are going to be going spare
Re: Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
#43Is this only until they are in position or are going to see this everytime they fly over?
You’ll be able to see them as individual dots any time they’re illuminated by the sun when they fly over at night (like any other satellite), but they won’t be bunched together like this.
Re: Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
that novel was amazing. I loved the 5000 year jump too. Although I found it difficult to visualize some of the futuristic parts. I think a movie is being made based on the novel.
I’m a bit nervous about the movie, unless they pull a Deathly Hallows and split it into two films. The audio book is 32 hours long. That’s a lot to pack into a ~2 hour movie. But that’s a pretty big risk to do with a single novel. Harry Potter had a massive and loyal fan base by the time the 7th and 8th movies came out.
Re: Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
#45Counted 52 spots, plus an additional 2 which only appeared briefly and dimly, a little off the track of the others. 4 or 5 dots seem to be pairs. So that acounts for pretty much all satellites. I'd like to experience this for myself. With 12000 of them the sky will be quite littered with them though. Astronomy will never be the same again.
>I’d like to experience this for myself. Find out when the satellites pass over you! Here's the TLE data that someone estimated: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/May-2019/0207.html Here's an online calculator: https://www.satellite-calculations.com/TLETracker/SatTracker... Plug in the TLE data, select your town or enter your coordinates, and generate a 24 hour projection! Find a time where the elevation is higher than 10…
This is using the exact same approach that many redditors said worked for them, but does the data-crunching for you. It's a modified version of the tool you linked to (Jen Satre's excellent satellite calculator), and hardcodes the Starlink data.
Re: Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
#46is this what its always going to look like when we have 12000 of the things in the sky? Astronomers are going to be going spare
Re: Starlink satellite-train visible with the naked eye
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
that novel was amazing. I loved the 5000 year jump too. Although I found it difficult to visualize some of the futuristic parts. I think a movie is being made based on the novel.
Interesting, I loved the book until the jump, after that I found it to be too ridiculous. The submarine storyline was absurd.