Live data from Hacker News

Serious Chrome zero-day

nakedsecurity.sophos.com

41–50 of 377 posts

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#42

Honest question - why do people use Chrome? It’s from an arguably as-evil company as Facebook. Alternatives exist. What’s the draw?

The Firefox Quantum update didn't work on my work machine; I had the choice of either using the LTS version or switch to Chrome, and I ended up switching to Chrome.

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#43

This blog post is so watered down and manages to digress at every possible point that it is almost impossible to read. The only useful part of the text are the URLs. Also, this: > A vulnerability, or vuln for short, is a bug that makes software go wrong in a way that reduces computer security. Does anyone actually use this abbreviation?

Totes.

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#44

This blog post is so watered down and manages to digress at every possible point that it is almost impossible to read. The only useful part of the text are the URLs. Also, this: > A vulnerability, or vuln for short, is a bug that makes software go wrong in a way that reduces computer security. Does anyone actually use this abbreviation?

> This blog post is so watered down and manages to digress at every possible point that it is almost impossible to read. Its target audience appears to be ten-year-olds, yet it's inexplicably devoid of memes.

the target audience is managers and bookkeepers who see the sophos invoice every month but have no idea what they do.

here is the blog post in meme form, for your convenience: https://memegenerator.net/img/instances/67508702/look-at-me-...

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#46

This blog post is so watered down and manages to digress at every possible point that it is almost impossible to read. The only useful part of the text are the URLs. Also, this: > A vulnerability, or vuln for short, is a bug that makes software go wrong in a way that reduces computer security. Does anyone actually use this abbreviation?

> Does anyone actually use this abbreviation? More common in plural (vulns). However, it sounds oddly vulgar in my ears.

> oddly vulgar

My initial reaction was 'linguistically disgusting', but I decided to hold off the opinion, just in case I am strangely illiterate.

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#47

Honest question - why do people use Chrome? It’s from an arguably as-evil company as Facebook. Alternatives exist. What’s the draw?

I gave Firefox an honest go, but some web apps just don't work 100% in it. Chrome does not have this issue. Most of us drive cars filled with fuel from evil oil companies, why do we all drive cars?

That compatibility with different browsers is a big enough issue in 2019 to stop you from using Firefox is just a sad reminder of how far we’ve fallen. Used to be that we actually cared about stuff being usable across browsers, after what we experienced during IE’s dominance.

It’s also a testament to Chrome’s dominance -now-.

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#49
post #27

Honest question - why do people use Chrome? It’s from an arguably as-evil company as Facebook. Alternatives exist. What’s the draw?

A lot of people have Google / Gmail accounts, with which it integrates very well. Also, most people don't care about ads/tracking, as evidenced by the massive number of people who still have Facebook accounts. It is a leader in web standards and features (e.g. PWAs). In my industry, it is a very secure solution (despite the vulnerability disclosed here), so it gets chosen for that reason. I personally prefer Vivaldi…

I think they already did or its coming in an update, I think. Also, Good luck trying to block auto-play videos in Chrome.

Re: Serious Chrome zero-day

#50

Honest question - why do people use Chrome? It’s from an arguably as-evil company as Facebook. Alternatives exist. What’s the draw?

I used it because it was fast, now I use Brave and it is fast and private.

And still vulnerable to this?
Post reply on HN