Live data from Hacker News

The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

viorel.me

41–50 of 68 posts

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#41

3,000 EUR to potentially get access to a ton of good domains doesn't seem like a big deal? If I knew I could register 100 interesting domains, I would totally be willing to pay that price.

Was it total, or per domain? The article doesn't clarify. 3000 total sounds super duper cheap.

It sounds like the license to be a reseller was just a single 3000 EUR upfront cost.

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#42
post #6
post #2

> If you want a really good domain, you can end up paying 500EUR per year for it. Can't you transfer it to a different reseller in the first year? You should be able to switch resellers with your domain. In worst case, you can start your own reseller.

yeah, you can switch resellers, so the info in the article is not corect.

Corect is not correct.

(Sorry.)

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#44
It's amazing how weirdly managed some TLDs are. There was the controversy with .io, but my favorite experience was .pn (Pitcairn Islands apparently.) I had a .pn domain for a year, that I bought directly from their nic. The trouble is, it's practically all managed manually. Luckily I didn't really need to, but I was not sure at all how to renew a .pn domain because I purchased it from a form that let me specify nameservers and a domain - that's it.

Some registars support it but generally only with business subscriptions like Gandi's - so it's actually cheaper to buy it directly. But I still find it fascinating how not-automated it all was.

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#45
post #24
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

it's not private until it have an owner. or are you normalizing the criminal behavior of godaddy where registrars can rush and buy the domain while you're doing the check out process just to sell back to you for more?

Citation for the GoDaddy claim?

OP is probably referencing domain front running. Basically when you search a registrar for an available domain, if the domain is available they'll put a 5 day hold on the domain, making it available solely through that registrar but not others. It forces the searcher to buy it through that one registrar if they want it. I couldn't find any direct evidence of GoDaddy doing it, but there's a lot anecdotal reports of them doing it, and it's confirmed that Network Solutions was doing this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_name_front_running

A comment in a previous discussion with some more information: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4362961

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#46
post #44

It's amazing how weirdly managed some TLDs are. There was the controversy with .io, but my favorite experience was .pn (Pitcairn Islands apparently.) I had a .pn domain for a year, that I bought directly from their nic. The trouble is, it's practically all managed manually. Luckily I didn't really need to, but I was not sure at all how to renew a .pn domain because I purchased it from a form that let me specify names…

Pitcairn only has 50 inhabitants according to Wikipedia! Apparently there was a conflict between the islander who had management of the domain and the island's Council (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.pn).

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#47
post #44

It's amazing how weirdly managed some TLDs are. There was the controversy with .io, but my favorite experience was .pn (Pitcairn Islands apparently.) I had a .pn domain for a year, that I bought directly from their nic. The trouble is, it's practically all managed manually. Luckily I didn't really need to, but I was not sure at all how to renew a .pn domain because I purchased it from a form that let me specify names…

Pitcairn only has 50 inhabitants according to Wikipedia! Apparently there was a conflict between the islander who had management of the domain and the island's Council (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.pn ).

This should be posted anytime someone asks about using a non-standard TLD. Do you really want it badly enough to take on the extra risk?

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#48

> Because that’s not quite sustainable (hindsight is 20/20), they decided to switch all the domains they already sold for life to yearly subscriptions. What? At least in the U.S., if you sell something with a lifetime ownership term, you can't just renege and change the terms after the fact (well you can try, but you're asking to be sued).

You can if you're the government.

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#49

> Because that’s not quite sustainable (hindsight is 20/20), they decided to switch all the domains they already sold for life to yearly subscriptions. What? At least in the U.S., if you sell something with a lifetime ownership term, you can't just renege and change the terms after the fact (well you can try, but you're asking to be sued).

Almost everything at this level of consumer has a TOS that allows the larger company/organization to basically change anything. And if it didn't most customers still wouldn't have the legal resources to challenge it. One of those interesting quirks of consumer free markets.

Re: The “.ro” Gold Rush (2018)

#50
post #45
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Citation for the GoDaddy claim?

OP is probably referencing domain front running. Basically when you search a registrar for an available domain, if the domain is available they'll put a 5 day hold on the domain, making it available solely through that registrar but not others. It forces the searcher to buy it through that one registrar if they want it. I couldn't find any direct evidence of GoDaddy doing it, but there's a lot anecdotal reports of th…

Thanks. That's pretty lame but definitely not the same as buying up the domain and then raising the price. (Which would be shady but also probably a money-loser overall.)
Post reply on HN