Live data from Hacker News

South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

dotesports.com

41–50 of 76 posts

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#41
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They'll put you in jail for accessing a public url structure in an unintended manner, though, under the CFAA. To me that's a bigger deal.

If you're referring to weev, this is not an accurate description of his case.

What about the 19 yo arrested for accessing public URLs on a FOIA site in Nova Scotia? The case was dropped but he was still arrested. Happened earlier this year. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/police-drop-charg...

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#42
post #37
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From where I live (not in the US) the US doesn't look particularly good as far as civil liberties go. Not that my country (Australia) is great either. We're just messed up in different ways.

None of the countries look particularly good, because we're on a backwards trend globally. But US still looks better than pretty much everybody else.

People who disagree with this should bear in mind the context from the parent comment - we're talking about civil rights specifically, not whether one country is better than another in general. I don't think there's much room for debate on whether US has the most expansive freedom of speech protections, for example. Many people would argue that it doesn't do a good job of balancing those rights with other matters of importance, but that is a different conversation.

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#43
post #20
post #6

when i was a kid, i thought the stuff about freedom in rhetoric about america was silly and nebulous, but as i get older it seems more true. don't get me wrong, i hate the surveillance panopticon, drug war, and permanent security state as much as anyone else, but at least the government doesn't put you in jail for cheating at video games.

From where I live (not in the US) the US doesn't look particularly good as far as civil liberties go. Not that my country (Australia) is great either. We're just messed up in different ways.

Which civil liberties do you think that you have in Australia, which has serious issues with censorship and speech laws, which we do not have in the US?

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#44
post #37
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From where I live (not in the US) the US doesn't look particularly good as far as civil liberties go. Not that my country (Australia) is great either. We're just messed up in different ways.

None of the countries look particularly good, because we're on a backwards trend globally. But US still looks better than pretty much everybody else.

I don't understand why you are being down-voted. All over the world, governments are indeed slowly becoming nanny states for the 'good of the people'. In India, for example, they just blocked all pornographic sites. Stuff like this doesn't make world news. The US is better by a far margin that most nations since your rights are explicitly stated in your constitution.

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#45
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From where I live (not in the US) the US doesn't look particularly good as far as civil liberties go. Not that my country (Australia) is great either. We're just messed up in different ways.

At least they don't have an official censorship regime like we have in Australia and NZ. We're still banning books here... primitive.

Thought you were referring to Australia's Internet censorship regime. They even (briefly) censored a Queensland dentist's website.

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#46
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, only my Mirimir persona uses this VM, with this VPN chain and exit IP. And I have Firefox delete all cookies at exit. So they don't get much from me, no matter what.

Any advice on economical methods for persona-specific VM chains? E.g. 5 personas times $X/month for a commercial VPN adds up quickly, not to mention the inconsistent reliability/transparency of VPN providers.

I use pfSense VMs as VPN gateways, so VPN chains are virtual networks. But you could do the same thing with physical routers. Given that most providers allow multiple connections, you just need a few accounts.

Let's say that you have accounts with two providers, VPNA and VPNB. So you always connect first to a VPNA server, and then through that to a VPNB server. Given that each provider likely has many servers, there are likely hundreds of possible chains. Not all of them will work well, for whatever reasons, but enough to be useful.

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#48
post #2

The South Korean government's obessession with regulating video games is quite interesting.

This seems very unusual even considering how popular esports are over there. Cheating in traditional sports is not a crime as far as I know as the punishment is just getting kicked out and having your winnings taken back.

What level of cheating are we speaking here? Bribing the ref, match fixing, doping are all forms of cheating in sports and could be a punishable crime.

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#49
post #36
post #7

So does this make selling accounts illegal too? Isn't the workaround simply to not play on someone elses account, but to play on your own account and then sell it to that person later?

In SK your game account is usually tied to your national ID, no?

How dystopian. Why would anyone accept such a restriction?

Re: South Korean law to punish boosters passes in the National Assembly

#50
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This seems very unusual even considering how popular esports are over there. Cheating in traditional sports is not a crime as far as I know as the punishment is just getting kicked out and having your winnings taken back.

What level of cheating are we speaking here? Bribing the ref, match fixing, doping are all forms of cheating in sports and could be a punishable crime.

The linked article doesn't say say that it is restricted to games that are played for money so it seems to be equivalent to being arrested for cheating in school sports day.
Post reply on HN