Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's your point? This doesn't relate to what you originally said, or to my reply to that.
Doesn't relate to your reply? I directly quoted the part of your reply I responded to. My point is, to repeat myself, that what we consider the reality behind the way something is made, what it is composed of, etc, does play a role on whether we like or dislike it. Like or dislike extends beyond the final artifact. We could even like something (e.g. a painting) and stop liking it, even though it's the same, if we fin…
(Also, the point of yours that I was originally replying to was "Because we (well, some of us) don't really like breathtaking complexity that's reducible to some simple rules." which is clearly referring to what is out there in reality not our view of it, and whether we like or dislike that characteristic of reality out there.).