Live data from Hacker News

The myth of meritocracy: who really gets what they deserve?

theguardian.com

41–43 of 43 posts

Re: The myth of meritocracy: who really gets what they deserve?

#41
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Personal attacks aren't allowed on HN, so please don't degrade this place further by posting them. Also, responding to a troll and thus feeding a dumb flamewar is the opposite of what the site guidelines ask. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here.

Sorry. That got me riled up. Troll successful.

Re: The myth of meritocracy: who really gets what they deserve?

#42
post #4

The conflict is simple: parents are stimulated to give the best upbringing possible to children - the prize is standing out the crowd - but at the same time it does not make much sense to be #1 in a wasteland.

In addition systems are in play that make it impossible for most people in poorer circles to give their children a kick up into a higher class. Some people get lucky but on the whole people aren't moving. Anything new that redreses the balance e.g. education is ultimately for sale to the highest bidder, plus I'll add another observation that the rich don't need to spend so much time on survival, they have more time to learn the tricks of staying rich.

To eloborate on the education for sale. Think of real estate prices near good high schools for example. Plus the high number of 1%ers in the top universities. I recently watched The Riot Club and thus film in an exagerated way sums it all up.

Post reply on HN