Live data from Hacker News

M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

nytimes.com

41–50 of 181 posts

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#41

Aren't they jumping the gun, here? We'll need a general AI that can graduate high school first.~ I'm not sure why they need an entirely new college. Doesn't that just increase administrative overhead out of proportion to any perceivable benefit?

Expanding scope is how middle managers forge new frontiers to advance their career.

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#43
post #13
post #9

College of Statistics and Nonlinear Function Approximation

Unfortunately, I think statistics will continue to be under-appreciated. All of my mathematics professors in undergraduate said that statistics and linear algebra are the two most useful fields of math to know and that dedicating time to studying them will pay dividends. It still surprises me when I apply for jobs today how few places, even financial or scientific firms, distinguish between statistics and mathematics…

I agree with u. https://www.sherekhudahazratali.com/2018/10/safar-ka-mahina-...

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#44
post #9

College of Statistics and Nonlinear Function Approximation

There is no subject under the name "Statistics and Nonlinear Function Approximation" that describes the algorithms involved in NLP. No subject or concept in the name "Statistics and Nonlinear Function Approximation" that describes the history and codification of breaking down an image into thousands of additional images and then performing the "statistics" - there is much more in ML/AI than what you'd like to call that college.

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#45
post #29
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Pretty sure MIT offers stats and linear algebra.

I don't doubt it and I don't doubt that M.I.T. will create an intensive AI college. My point was that a lot of universities, even distinguished ones, are recognizing that there's a real demand and hype for "AI/Data Science" degrees and in an effort to maximize enrollment and appeal they often minimize the mathematical and statistical requirements. I don't believe that you need an advanced degree to become a component…

Maybe it's just me, but having gone through all the stats and maths behind ML, it seems like ultimately the less interesting part (though to be fair, algorithm design is similarly uninteresting for similar reasons). We're talking about a lot of very long-in-the-tooth concepts that are still the basis of many, many approaches. They're important, but it's well-worn territory.

The underappreciated parts of AI, in my experience, are more philosophical; about the nature of reasoning and approximating or beating human thought. About autonomous agents, non zero-sum games and ethical, non-maximizing functions. There's a huge overlap with logic (philosophical and mathematical) here, and I haven't seen that really broached at any of these big programs.

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#46
This sounds like a direct response to two things (mostly): 1) CMU establishing a 'department' of AI (where MIT had merely an AI track within the CS program), and 2) Kai-Fu Lee's recent book on the rise and inevitable domination by China of all things AI-related -- inviting a new 'space race' between the superpowers. (A 'brain race'?)

Yet I can't imagine why an entire 'college' of AI is needed. AI simply isn't a field that's deep or broad enough to warrant an entire college with a handful of distinct majors, like an engineering college or medical school. Each of this college's AI degrees will span distinct problem or solution spaces? Not likely.

Maybe this was the only way to ensure the gift of all $350 million. Or to build multiple new buildings...

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#47
I have been and continue to remain very skeptical about all this hoopla about AI.

Five years ago, I thought the hoopla about AI is just a fashion and it's all going to quickly pass.

Two years ago, I thought it's a bubble that will eventually burst.

At this point, I'm wondering whether what's happening is pure re-branding where we'll stop using the term CS and instead use the term AI.

If I think of AI as CS, I'm ok with it although I don't think graphics, comp. architecture, networking, and OS are AI. But if the rest of the world wants to call them AI, then let them.

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#48

This sounds like a direct response to two things (mostly): 1) CMU establishing a 'department' of AI (where MIT had merely an AI track within the CS program), and 2) Kai-Fu Lee's recent book on the rise and inevitable domination by China of all things AI-related -- inviting a new 'space race' between the superpowers. (A 'brain race'?) Yet I can't imagine why an entire 'college' of AI is needed. AI simply isn't a field…

> Each of this college's AI degrees will span distinct problem or solution spaces? Not likely.

I don't see why not? We are a long way away from general AI.

Re: M.I.T. Plans College for Artificial Intelligence, Backed by $1B

#50
post #13
post #9

College of Statistics and Nonlinear Function Approximation

Unfortunately, I think statistics will continue to be under-appreciated. All of my mathematics professors in undergraduate said that statistics and linear algebra are the two most useful fields of math to know and that dedicating time to studying them will pay dividends. It still surprises me when I apply for jobs today how few places, even financial or scientific firms, distinguish between statistics and mathematics…

> distinguish between statistics and mathematics

It has always seemed to me that it is correct distinction. Although there exists a branch of mathematics called mathematical statistics, by its very nature statistics is more like physics, in that it is trying to develop efficient methods of getting information about the objective world based on a certain kind of observations and measurements; and, of course, just as theoretical physics, statistics is highly mathematical, which often creates confusion regarding the actual subject of investigation.

Post reply on HN