41–46 of 46 posts
I honestly think that article 11 and 13 will grow more decentralized options. Peertube is only federated, so it won't benefit as much as it could, but it will still help. If the platform is responsible for copyright, then it will definitely be easier to just burn that server and then spin up a new one. Just my 2 cents
I honestly think that article 11 and 13 will grow more decentralized options. Peertube is only federated, so it won't benefit as much as it could, but it will still help. If the platform is responsible for copyright, then it will definitely be easier to just burn that server and then spin up a new one. Just my 2 cents
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sponsorships are only one form of monetization. The competitive feature for content creators here is ad revenue sharing. The only thing I got from reading this write up is that it will be pretty easy for someone to create their own instance and throw ads on someone else's content.
It seems like for many creators on youtube the ad revenue sharing is no longer a notable source of their income.
That long tail is what drives growth for these platforms anyways.
> I have a lot to say because I have a lot to think about. Oh boy.
Thanks for the dose of humility.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or the lack of anyway to monetize your content other than link to a method for accepting donations.
The amount of money you make off youtube ads has fallen off a cliff, almost all big content makers rely on patreon these days. Even for millions of views on a video its typically less than $100