My question has always been the same: if/when these measures don’t change anything, what then? The disconnect I have noticed is that there are all sorts of metrics for measuring diversity, but there is no quantitative argument for why the programs intended to aid diversity will raise those metrics. There’s no “this number is too low, and doing xyz will increase it.” Instead it’s more like “these numbers are bad, so we’re doing some stuff.”
Doing things ostensibly intended to improve diversity, but which don’t improve it, is more insidious than just not doing anything. It provides a moral alibi for the status quo but cynically does not actually want to change it. I’m not saying we’re there yet, but we will be if not much changes in a few years.