So the outcome here is: - All key leadership and board memebers are to be fired and replaced within 30 days - US picked compliance team embedded in ZTE that the commerce department is reimbursed for by ZTE - $1B fine and $400M in escrow - Qualcomm / NXP deal seems likely to be approved, helping US jobs In the past we've seen other countries deal with Iran while under sanctions, and we've gotten nothing out of them ot…
> In the past we've seen other countries deal with Iran while under sanctions, and we've gotten nothing out of them other than speeches at the U.N. > I kinda think I like this better. I think this is immensely unfair - you cite one deal that got a lot of press due to a series of unexpected about-faces in the US position. There’s no reason to believe that agreements of this nature are made but not publicized. Also, I'…
ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
41–50 of 61 posts
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ever notice how Republican presidents are always portrayed by partisan liberals as blithering idiots (Bush II as a religious fundamentalist warmonger dunce; Trump as an narcissistic ADD loose cannon dunce)? And how Democrat presidents are always portrayed by partisan conservatives as morally corrupt degenerates (Clinton as a murdering, philandering drug kingpin; Obama as a Kenyan-born Muslim homosexual on globalist p…
Trump has confirmed himself that he does not read. Not books, not the news. It is widely reported by his own cabinet the man does not pay attention or have the depth of understanding of well, anything. The thing about Obama being a muslim homosexual is fucking stupid and not worth responding to.
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#43Meanwhile, a Chinese state investment puts $500 million dollars towards an Indonesian project heavily involving Trump properties, golf courses and branding. https://www.nationalreview.com/news/china-contributing-500-m... Peddling influence and using government for personal profit seems par for the course in this administration. https://www.salon.com/2018/05/16/trumps-bizarre-zte-tweets-p...
China knows how to play the game. They know that their investment won't stay under wraps... so I don't see how this would benefit Trump. Could the trump organization have rejected China's investment into the Indonesian state project if they wanted to stay clean? Or would that require dropping out of the entire project completely, and what would the contract violation terms have entailed if they were as major a part o…
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#44“Too many jobs in China lost” - Xi’s waterboy and president of the USA
1.4 Billion in penalties. I don't see any other President of the USA doing that. Its a WIN for us.
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#45So the outcome here is: - All key leadership and board memebers are to be fired and replaced within 30 days - US picked compliance team embedded in ZTE that the commerce department is reimbursed for by ZTE - $1B fine and $400M in escrow - Qualcomm / NXP deal seems likely to be approved, helping US jobs In the past we've seen other countries deal with Iran while under sanctions, and we've gotten nothing out of them ot…
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
And I suppose one man's "successful negotiation" is another man's "fragile egomaniac taken advantage of again". Much like his inaugural Carrier "negotiation", these things tend to fluff his ego, benefit the other party and somehow leave everyone else worse off.
Ever notice how Republican presidents are always portrayed by partisan liberals as blithering idiots (Bush II as a religious fundamentalist warmonger dunce; Trump as an narcissistic ADD loose cannon dunce)? And how Democrat presidents are always portrayed by partisan conservatives as morally corrupt degenerates (Clinton as a murdering, philandering drug kingpin; Obama as a Kenyan-born Muslim homosexual on globalist p…
W was a bit naive but not a dunce. His folksy Texas way of talking was an affectation. He flew fighter jets in the 70s, when that was about as safe and easy as juggling chainsaws. I think W is one of the worst leaders we’ve ever had, but he wasn’t an idiot.
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
China knows how to play the game. They know that their investment won't stay under wraps... so I don't see how this would benefit Trump. Could the trump organization have rejected China's investment into the Indonesian state project if they wanted to stay clean? Or would that require dropping out of the entire project completely, and what would the contract violation terms have entailed if they were as major a part o…
All of your questions demonstrate why the President should never be in that situation in the first place. That Trump wasn’t instantaneously impeached for enormous ongoing conflicts of interest is a stain on Congressional leadership.
As an aside, the president should first and foremost, represent the nation's best interests. But I can't determine what Trump holds in higher regard, the office of the president, or himself. I imagine most people think being president of the US would be the highest position in the world. For any politician at least, US or foreign, the top of their food chain is the US President. But how does a billionaire like Bezos, with a business and news-media empire, view being president? Does someone like that look down or up? What I mean is, would and should a billionaire 'play' president the same way a politician would 'play' president? My imagination is that a billionaire would want to become president in order to use the office to accomplish political goals not possible simply with money, versus a career politician who might simply see the US Presidency as a goal in itself. At the end of the day, both want to see their desired outcomes come to fruition, both want to be in a position of governmental power to make their wants happen. Which one is better for the nation?
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
All of your questions demonstrate why the President should never be in that situation in the first place. That Trump wasn’t instantaneously impeached for enormous ongoing conflicts of interest is a stain on Congressional leadership.
Very true, could you imagine the political implications if the Trump organization DID reject the Chinese investment into an Indonesian state project? If acceptance of money is, ipso facto, a sign of political corruption, then would blocking the exchange of money between 2 sovereign nations be considered meddling in foreign economies? What intentions could be read from an act of rejection? How much of the invested mon…
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Very true, could you imagine the political implications if the Trump organization DID reject the Chinese investment into an Indonesian state project? If acceptance of money is, ipso facto, a sign of political corruption, then would blocking the exchange of money between 2 sovereign nations be considered meddling in foreign economies? What intentions could be read from an act of rejection? How much of the invested mon…
I don’t understand what you’re saying about what Clinton Foundation. It wasn’t formed until after Bill left office and as far as I know Obama wasn’t involved. The worst Obama did was have a book people could buy.
Re: ZTE of China to Pay $1B Fine in Deal to End U.S. Sanctions
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t understand what you’re saying about what Clinton Foundation. It wasn’t formed until after Bill left office and as far as I know Obama wasn’t involved. The worst Obama did was have a book people could buy.
I had to look it up since I didn't know enough about it, but it looks like the Clinton Foundation was set up in 1997, at the beginning of Bill's 2nd term. As for mentioning Obama's term, what I meant by that was that since Hillary was Secretary of State at the time, there's definite potential for conflict of interest. I used wikipedia for my info. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Foundation