Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Not especially surprising, nor damning of american-borns I disagree. I wouldn't be sanguine about it. Previous major waves of technical innovation were lead by well established Americans. Something has changed. A plausible hypothesis (not that I'm convinced) is that high immigration has driven down wages in technical professions. So native born Americans are less inclined to bother. I think it's important to point…
From 1921 to 1965 immigration was practically nothing. Uhm, what? Perhaps in raw numbers, but the world wars drove vast numbers of european intellectuals to the US.
"50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
41–50 of 56 posts
Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#42Not especially surprising, nor damning of american-borns. Those with the motivation, skills, and education to move abroad (to anywhere!) and start a business are going to, on average, outperform the population which was born there. Not because they are naturally better, but because they were self-selected by being there in the first place. Just like I'd be willing to bet that americans living abroad are overrepresent…
Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#43I'd imagine immigrants aren't so laden with debt, so they have more freedom. Many countries don't charge their native students for higher education, those that do, are often subsidised and repayments are linked to their earnings. So if you earn a small salary, you pay nothing.
I don't imagine this being that large of problem this is with majors like computer science. By going to a public school and interning during the summer (maybe even part time during the year), you can easily come out debt free (if not positive).
Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#44People who are born in the US probably have less incentive to leave 'home'. High probability that they've developed business relationships and a network of people in their hometown or place of schooling, giving them an advantage that is taken away if they move to Silicon Valley.
Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#45Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#46Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#47Immigrants by self-selection are already risk-takers, that fits well as a trait to be an entrepreneur.
Immigrants are not only risk-takers, they are mainly avoiding poverty and looking for better conditions.
Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#48The idea that we could draw in more founders just by letting them come here... seems like an easy win. All those startups and all the high skill workers they'd attract. Imagine the synergy of all that talent in one place. It could be the next renaissance.
Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#49Re: "50% of firm founders [in Silicon Valley] are foreign born"
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't imagine this being that large of problem this is with majors like computer science. By going to a public school and interning during the summer (maybe even part time during the year), you can easily come out debt free (if not positive).
Yes but percentage of CS students actually finish with low debt? I would imagine it's lowish.
At my alma matter (Berkeley), I imagine it was quite high. Not so much due to the high paying internships (which do help limit the burden), but because CS students on average tended to come from quite affluent households.