41–50 of 88 posts
There's also one with the fixed stars held... fixed. https://twitter.com/landru79/status/988807933243863040
And since massimo is a horrible disgusting freebooter who uploads degraded, double-encoded stuff he downloads from other people, there's also a clearer version of the OP video from the original creator themselves: https://twitter.com/landru79/status/988490703075463168
Unfortunately Twitter butchers video quality. I remade both landru79's videos from scratch using original ESA 2048x2048 image sequence (plus I added a bit of motion interpolation): http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta.webm [50MB] http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta_stars.mp4 [28MB] ----- Edit: in case my server doesn't hold up, here are video mirrors on Streamable: https://streamable.com/w2wgj https:…
Unfortunately Twitter butchers video quality. I remade both landru79's videos from scratch using original ESA 2048x2048 image sequence (plus I added a bit of motion interpolation): http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta.webm [50MB] http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta_stars.mp4 [28MB] ----- Edit: in case my server doesn't hold up, here are video mirrors on Streamable: https://streamable.com/w2wgj https:…
I don't understand the perspective here. Is this the orbiter looking "across" the comet, but "zoomed in" so it looks like we are standing on it?
Unfortunately Twitter butchers video quality. I remade both landru79's videos from scratch using original ESA 2048x2048 image sequence (plus I added a bit of motion interpolation): http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta.webm [50MB] http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta_stars.mp4 [28MB] ----- Edit: in case my server doesn't hold up, here are video mirrors on Streamable: https://streamable.com/w2wgj https:…
Unfortunately Twitter butchers video quality. I remade both landru79's videos from scratch using original ESA 2048x2048 image sequence (plus I added a bit of motion interpolation): http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta.webm [50MB] http://alteredqualia.com/tmp/rosetta/rosetta_stars.mp4 [28MB] ----- Edit: in case my server doesn't hold up, here are video mirrors on Streamable: https://streamable.com/w2wgj https:…
You're very talented, this is dope. Thanks for taking the time to make this and share it with us!
Go check landru79's Twitter feed, there are many more interesting comet images and videos (e.g. he combines multiple frames into color images):
BTW here are original ESA images:
https://imagearchives.esac.esa.int/index.php?/category/410/s...
To truly grasp the awesomeness of this video I want to know is it 1 month of composite images or 1 to 1 video? Anyone?
To put things in perspective, the comet, 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, is about 4km in diameter, moving at 135,000kms per hour. Rosetta's rendezvousing with the comet required travelling a cumulative distance of over 6.4 billion kms. Gravity assists were needed from four planetary flybys – one of Mars (2007) and three of Earth (2005, 2007 and 2009) – a long circuitous trip that took ten years to complete. Now back to my…
To be fair, people have been studying and predicting celestial movements for millennia, and boiled it down to unbelievably precise mechanical formulae. JS is poorly understood in comparison. I say this to hope you feel better at work. I've been pressed into frontend web work and it's fractal complexity.
"With a combination of large ground-based FORTRAN programs and small spacecraft-based assembly language programs, [Real Programmers] are able to do incredible feats of navigation and improvisation -- hitting ten-kilometer wide windows at Saturn after six years in space, repairing or bypassing damaged sensor platforms, radios, and batteries. Allegedly, one Real Programmer managed to tuck a pattern-matching program into a few hundred bytes of unused memory in a Voyager spacecraft that searched for, located, and photographed a new moon of Jupiter.
The current plan for the Galileo spacecraft is to use a gravity assist trajectory past Mars on the way to Jupiter. This trajectory passes within 80+/-3 kilometers of the surface of Mars. Nobody is going to trust a PASCAL program (or a PASCAL programmer) for navigation to these tolerances."
ESA PR is basically hopeless. It's the polar opposite of NASA. I guess the budget is nonexistent. Good that there are people that disseminate these things on Twitter etc. The Rosetta and Philae stuff, Emily Lakdawalla of Planetary Society did a better job of covering it than anyone at ESA, unfortunately.
(Honestly as a news consumer it's not all that bad because it means I can trust any communications coming from NASA proper to be purely mission oriented—focused on science.)
To put things in perspective, the comet, 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, is about 4km in diameter, moving at 135,000kms per hour. Rosetta's rendezvousing with the comet required travelling a cumulative distance of over 6.4 billion kms. Gravity assists were needed from four planetary flybys – one of Mars (2007) and three of Earth (2005, 2007 and 2009) – a long circuitous trip that took ten years to complete. Now back to my…
To be fair, people have been studying and predicting celestial movements for millennia, and boiled it down to unbelievably precise mechanical formulae. JS is poorly understood in comparison. I say this to hope you feel better at work. I've been pressed into frontend web work and it's fractal complexity.