Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's really a clever trick, though my initial reaction was horror at the idea of checking one's grammar against the Internet. Looks like Scribe is only looking one or two words ahead, though - it's not actually checking what you've written, just throwing the Google Suggest box into your writing.
I use it all the time to check difficult words. It works well. Google usually even suggests "did you mean" the right spelling when you get it wrong.
Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
41–50 of 71 posts
Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#42Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#43Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#44Interesting. It can also be used as a Markov chain text generator. Type one word, then just accept every suggestion. "In the case of these two types of information that is not appropriate for all users of the catalogue should also be noted that there is anything you would not believe how much I loved them."
Kara Thrace and here is their website and buy this product again and again and I'ma let you finish but Beyonce had one of these days I'll bet your life on the road today and they are nothing but another form of therapy for these patients is not known whether these are the only ones who can not afford to pay for their own users and groups to their Friends / Favorites list yet.
That was... trippy.
Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#45Interesting. It can also be used as a Markov chain text generator. Type one word, then just accept every suggestion. "In the case of these two types of information that is not appropriate for all users of the catalogue should also be noted that there is anything you would not believe how much I loved them."
Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#46There are so many things to say about this. Thanks to Google for creating this tool which I must say still seems a bit random in its objectives though. I think the main issue here is that logic behind scribe is based on statistical frequency of co-occurrence of strings rather than any semantic logic. Granted, automating the semantics here could be tough and very expensive with the amounts of data available to Google'…
Interesting, thanks. I'm not sure if I agree, though; I think our natural understanding of language is acquired mainly though statistical inference, even though it may be encoded in the brain using a semantic taxonomy for efficiency. I doubt that a lot of people will use this, although the obvious place to deploy it is in mobile communications, where per-word prediction is still very slow and text entry is very ineff…
Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#47There are so many things to say about this. Thanks to Google for creating this tool which I must say still seems a bit random in its objectives though. I think the main issue here is that logic behind scribe is based on statistical frequency of co-occurrence of strings rather than any semantic logic. Granted, automating the semantics here could be tough and very expensive with the amounts of data available to Google'…
Interesting, thanks. I'm not sure if I agree, though; I think our natural understanding of language is acquired mainly though statistical inference, even though it may be encoded in the brain using a semantic taxonomy for efficiency. I doubt that a lot of people will use this, although the obvious place to deploy it is in mobile communications, where per-word prediction is still very slow and text entry is very ineff…
Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#48Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#49Re: Google Scribe - Get autocomplete suggestions as you type
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting, thanks. I'm not sure if I agree, though; I think our natural understanding of language is acquired mainly though statistical inference, even though it may be encoded in the brain using a semantic taxonomy for efficiency. I doubt that a lot of people will use this, although the obvious place to deploy it is in mobile communications, where per-word prediction is still very slow and text entry is very ineff…
From my very limited knowledge of language acquisition, my guess is you might be wrong (although I'm happy to be corrected). Don't human children acquire language much faster, more accurately and from poorer signals than would be possible via statistical inference?
I don't have a really strong opinion, though I lean a bit towards the behaviorist approach. There have been some suggestions from ethnomusicologists that small children everywhere sing the same sort of melody on the same scale, which inclined me to the opposite view for a while, but I think that was more of a theory than a finding and still needs evidence.