Live data from Hacker News

Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

mozilla.org

41–50 of 95 posts

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#41

It still feels like the 90s software.

I agree, in a positive way. It feels fast, no-nonsense UI and takes as little space as possible on your harddrive. Much better than 2000s software where internet connection is a must, UI is as pretty as possible without considerations for the user and often is 200MB for a simple todo list manager.

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#42

Thunderbird is still the best crossplatform, multi account mail client around. Everybody migrated to webmail, but for those old grumps of us who still have multiple email accounts, and maybe even follow some newsgroups, tb is still the best player in town. Thanks tb team for your work! I love you all!

> Everybody migrated to webmail That is so far from the truth it isn’t even funny. Outlook reigns in corporate and phones have native clients. Hell, i am still waiting for POP3 to die.

For some reason I equate Microsoft Outlook with corporate hellhole.

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#44

Thunderbird is still the best crossplatform, multi account mail client around. Everybody migrated to webmail, but for those old grumps of us who still have multiple email accounts, and maybe even follow some newsgroups, tb is still the best player in town. Thanks tb team for your work! I love you all!

Mostly to avoid service vendor lockin, I'd like to switch back to Thunderbird -- after I have a solid plan for replicated local backups, under my physical control. Is this practical with IMAP, or would POP3 be the way?

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the OP but yes, and Clawsmail. Still keep coming back to Thunderbird. There are so many useful add-ons it's hard to leave. And add-ons are easier to write.

What add-ons do you use regularly?

"Nostalgy" is the key one for me. Folder filling and navigation from the keyboard only. If you know emacs and helm, it has a bit of its feel.

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#47

I'll have to give it a shot, but the last time I used thunderbird it was unusably slow at pretty much everything. Compacting my folders would help for a day or two, and then it'd basically become unresponsive for 30s or more with any user input. I hope they focus on performance in coming revisions.

Don't trust random me on the internet (I'm dog, woof), google it yourself - but for me deleting "panacea.dat" made everything fast again.

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#48
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This may or may not help, but ex. mutt lets you read HTML mail by running it through lynx/elinks/w3m [0], and I've had great success with this in a mostly-Outlook environment. I expect you could do the same thing with other clients. [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mutt#Viewing_HTML

Mutt is terrible for imap on a laptop, it hangs and loses changes when the connection dies. Or has this been fixed?

I don't know if it's been fixed, but I recommend pointing mutt at an offline copy of your mail instead of directly at an IMAP server. Use isync or another program to sync your mail.

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#49
post #48
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mutt is terrible for imap on a laptop, it hangs and loses changes when the connection dies. Or has this been fixed?

I don't know if it's been fixed, but I recommend pointing mutt at an offline copy of your mail instead of directly at an IMAP server. Use isync or another program to sync your mail.

[deleted]

Re: Thunderbird 52.7.0 released

#50
post #48
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mutt is terrible for imap on a laptop, it hangs and loses changes when the connection dies. Or has this been fixed?

I don't know if it's been fixed, but I recommend pointing mutt at an offline copy of your mail instead of directly at an IMAP server. Use isync or another program to sync your mail.

When your mailbox is many gigabytes and you have small SSD, this is out of questions. Using IMAP allows only mail headers to be locally preserved.
Post reply on HN