Live data from Hacker News

Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

privateinternetaccess.com

41–50 of 70 posts

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you compared it today with what it was circa 1995? Yes, it is in tatters.

look, i get that you've gotten yourself into a career where you're adjacent to the legal system so you have no ability to critically evaluate anything beyond "it is/isn't legal therefore it is/isn't good" but if you try talking to a young person you might realize the number of independent artists has been exploding every year for a decade and we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the hist…

"we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the history of the world"

Where exactly are you getting this? I find it extremely unlikely, and I'd bet the opposite. Just because it's now easier to discover artists, does not mean that there are more of them. My position is based on the many former artists I know who abandoned what they did b/c of the futility of being able to support themselves.

But the issue is bigger than just creating the most amount of art. On a moral level, an artist should have some ability to control how their art is distributed. Just because it can be easy or free for others to enjoy it doesn't mean that everyone is entitled to it.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

look, i get that you've gotten yourself into a career where you're adjacent to the legal system so you have no ability to critically evaluate anything beyond "it is/isn't legal therefore it is/isn't good" but if you try talking to a young person you might realize the number of independent artists has been exploding every year for a decade and we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the hist…

"we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the history of the world" Where exactly are you getting this? I find it extremely unlikely, and I'd bet the opposite. Just because it's now easier to discover artists, does not mean that there are more of them. My position is based on the many former artists I know who abandoned what they did b/c of the futility of being able to support themselves. B…

There are a lot more people than at any time in history. Getting food and housing is also significantly easier today than it was in (most of?) the past. It figures that there are a lot more people creating music today than at any time in the past.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#43
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't know Swedish law, but I will guess that like American law, any parliament/house member can introduce basically any bill saying anything. So this "bill" is the result of an investigation started by the government. The investigation concludes (document posted by me elsewhere in this thread (in Swedish)) that it would be appropriate to change the law, and what the "bill" should look like. Have not found the st…

Ok, that's interesting then. That suggests that the typical Swedish person feels that sharing copyrighted content is a heinous crime, on par with homicide. Do you think that's accurate? Why would the average person feel so strongly negative about this topic?

> That suggests that the typical Swedish person feels that sharing copyrighted content is a heinous crime, on par with homicide.

Well... I'm not sure that's how you should see it. For example, skimming the document I mentioned, they have a section "Konsekvensanalys"/Analysis of consequences. There they address for example socio-economic impact, but not "popular opinion on the matter", or similar.

I think it would be more appropriate to see the investigation as objective (to some degree), and the final voting by the parties (on a potential future bill) as their considerations how this would impact their popularity. If the objective conclusion is that X should be done, a party may still not vote to implement X because of peoples opinion on the matter.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#44

As a swede, I am unfortunately not surprised. While we have a surge in violent crimes mainly due to mass immigration this kind of shit gets pushed. When I was young, explosions and gang criminality were extremely rare and uncommon but today it is unfortunately being more common. I have several friends, including me, that has been the victim of either threats or violence in the recent years but the perpetrators always…

You forgot to mention how some of your best friends are immigrants.

An incompetent government and corrupt politicians can ruin anything. Including their own immigration policies by being dysfunctional and in the end boosting the anti-immigration forces on the other end of the political spectrum.

Interesting times.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#45
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are we still saying piracy loses money for somebody? Even after the EU paper about it? Why is it so hard to believe research? https://juliareda.eu/2017/09/secret-copyright-infringement-s...

You cite a single article, which goes against the past two decades of experience, where illegal downloads have decimated much of the entire music industry.

Last month I bought another external harddisk as a second security copy for my photos (can sound like a cliche, but this was their sole purpose). They say me that I have to pay around 8 euro extra, because I could be a pirate. So I had been fined by a private company, not related with the maker of the hardware and with the complicity of the government. Not much different than if bankers would push and force the government to make everybody serve three months in jail; because "everybody could be a bank robber".

Law is based in the norm that you can't pay two times for the same crime. I had paid yet "for copying a few titles". I pay each time I buy a computer, a telephone or an SD target, so I feel morally vindicated to take a modest profit of my pre-crime also.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#46
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are we still saying piracy loses money for somebody? Even after the EU paper about it? Why is it so hard to believe research? https://juliareda.eu/2017/09/secret-copyright-infringement-s...

You cite a single article, which goes against the past two decades of experience, where illegal downloads have decimated much of the entire music industry.

Music had physical copies. But with the internet, all physicality was lost. That's what cost the decimation.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#47
post #28

As a swede, I am unfortunately not surprised. While we have a surge in violent crimes mainly due to mass immigration this kind of shit gets pushed. When I was young, explosions and gang criminality were extremely rare and uncommon but today it is unfortunately being more common. I have several friends, including me, that has been the victim of either threats or violence in the recent years but the perpetrators always…

> When I was young, explosions and gang criminality were extremely rare and uncommon Are you sure about this? Crime has decreased significantly over the past decades in most countries. I also can't remember any crime from when I was young but my area was much more dangerous back then. But as a child, you don't notice subtle signs of crime and won't get beaten up because you try to prevent people from stealing a bike.…

Yes I am sure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_grenade_attacks_in_Swe...

https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=1637&ar...

http://www.dagensjuridik.se/2017/09/sverige-i-topp-med-antal...

> In Germany [solved crimes involving shooting] they are close to 90 percent and in Finland more than 90 percent. In Sweden, as the firearm has increased, the level of clearance has also declined steadily since the late 90's.

But yeah, downvote me for stating facts.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#48

As a swede, I am unfortunately not surprised. While we have a surge in violent crimes mainly due to mass immigration this kind of shit gets pushed. When I was young, explosions and gang criminality were extremely rare and uncommon but today it is unfortunately being more common. I have several friends, including me, that has been the victim of either threats or violence in the recent years but the perpetrators always…

You forgot to mention how some of your best friends are immigrants.

Thanks for proving my point and making me more sure that I am correct. You can't be critical of developments that are statistically backed without being downvoted and ridiculed by the politically correct people.

If you really want to know, I am currently dating an immigrant but I do not have many friends that are immigrants.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#49
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are we still saying piracy loses money for somebody? Even after the EU paper about it? Why is it so hard to believe research? https://juliareda.eu/2017/09/secret-copyright-infringement-s...

You cite a single article, which goes against the past two decades of experience, where illegal downloads have decimated much of the entire music industry.

The music industry decimated itself, by being stuck in their backwards ways. They stagnated instead of innovating, and ignored the vast array of new technologies that became available to them.

They shunned digital distribution and preferred to bet on ill-conceived retrofitted DRM on CDs. They attempted to instigate a migration to new DRM-laden formats (DVD-A and SACD) with false claims of better sound quality. They completely neglected streaming possibilities until Spotify et al. came and caught them with their pants down. Now they are trying to milk the streaming companies as hard as they possibly can, killing their Golden Goose in the process.

They are seeing record profits from streaming, but they continue to tighten the leash.

Re: Crazy new Swedish bill makes sharing music and TV as bad a “crime” as manslaughter

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

look, i get that you've gotten yourself into a career where you're adjacent to the legal system so you have no ability to critically evaluate anything beyond "it is/isn't legal therefore it is/isn't good" but if you try talking to a young person you might realize the number of independent artists has been exploding every year for a decade and we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the hist…

"we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the history of the world" Where exactly are you getting this? I find it extremely unlikely, and I'd bet the opposite. Just because it's now easier to discover artists, does not mean that there are more of them. My position is based on the many former artists I know who abandoned what they did b/c of the futility of being able to support themselves. B…

>"we now have more people creating quality music than ever before in the history of the world"

Where exactly are you getting this? I find it extremely unlikely, and I'd bet the opposite. Just because it's now easier to discover artists, does not mean that there are more of them. My position is based on the many former artists I know who abandoned what they did b/c of the futility of being able to support themselves.

There are absolutely more bands now than ever before. In the olden days, you needed a studio full of expensive gear, and sound engineers to work the gear. You needed production facilities to press LPs/CDs and you needed distribution and promotion deals to get your name out there and make something for people to buy. All of this necessitated a big investment, so the concept of the record deal was born, and the labels grew fat and happy, mostly because they exploited the hell out of the struggling artists, with onerous contracts.

Even just being a garage musician was more expensive back then, as instruments and gear used to cost a lot more than it does today.

Today everyone with a PC can record music inexpensively. Reaper is an absolutely fantastic DAW and very fairly priced, and high quality audio interfaces with good preamps can be had for a couple hundred dollars. That's not to say that these people will produce anything of notable quality, but the bar is so low now that basically anyone can give it a go.

For promotion, you can very successfully go by word of mouth on social media, instead of relying on traditional promotion.

For distribution, it is easier now than every before. Anyone can create a Bandcamp profile and upload their music. Bandcamp handles the layouts, tagging, re-encoding and provides streamlined shopping, both for downloadable tracks and for physical merchandise. Their terms are easy and uncomplicated, there are no long confusing contracts, and they're extremely friendly and easy to deal with, in my experience. They take a 15% cut, which reduces to 10% if you sell over a certain amount per year: https://bandcamp.com/pricing

>But the issue is bigger than just creating the most amount of art. On a moral level, an artist should have some ability to control how their art is distributed. Just because it can be easy or free for others to enjoy it doesn't mean that everyone is entitled to it.

Yes, the artist should absolutely have control over how their art is distributed, which is why the big labels need to die, along with their onerous contracts and manipulation.

Post reply on HN