Live data from Hacker News

Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

steamcommunity.com

41–50 of 412 posts

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#41
post #35

why are transaction costs so high? I thought one of the selling points was that the transaction cost is negligible because miners main incentive comes from mining new bitcoins?

Doesn't it become exponentially more expensive to mine bitcoins? The more bitcoins there are, the more resources it costs to mine new ones?

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but you could set transaction fee to 20 cents, it would just take much longer to get confirmed?

No, because your fee is constantly competing to get into the block against future fees as miners sort the mempool by satoshi/byte to fill up the block. Check out the asymptote: https://estimatefee.com/

right, so to get confirmed within 10 hours, I can set the fee to $0.19, according to this website.

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#43
post #30
post #3

It's for the same reason that no one wanted to touch zimbabwe dollar back in 2007, if the value of the medium of exchange differs from breakfast to lunch it's not really a good medium of exchange. Doesn't matter if value is appreciating or depreciating, currency needs to have a reasonably stable value to be useful.

The volatility alone wouldn't be a huge problem if the transactions were quick, apart from having to constantly re-price the goods (not a big deal with an automated system selling digital downloads, even though it is a real PITA for the accounting afterwards!). However, getting the transaction confirmed can take many hours at the times of high demand and then it still fails because thanks to the volatility, the trans…

> I think this is what will ultimately bring Bitcoin down

People have been saying that for years. It serves purposes other than buying and selling goods, and in fact almost no one uses it to buy things.

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#44
post #35

why are transaction costs so high? I thought one of the selling points was that the transaction cost is negligible because miners main incentive comes from mining new bitcoins?

because other people are willing to pay more fees for their transactions to be confirmed?

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#45
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems like the main issue is transaction fees are close to $20, so even simple operations like refunding users for a incorrect or incomplete transaction is infeasible.

The "$20 transaction fee" was an absolute top, and when that happened it was the single most congested the bitcoin network has ever been. It's nowhere near that right now. The total cost for your "median" transaction right now (at 226 bytes) is about $4.30 USD (at 150 sat/byte). Even if you double that to 300 sat/byte you are still at ~$9. Edit: I'm not saying even $4 fees are okay, just pointing out that it's not $2…

How are these transaction fee amounts even determined? With something like credit cards, PayPal, or EFT the fees are deterministic.

With Bitcoin it seems fees are both ridiculously high, plus I can't even tell what I am going to be charged?

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#46
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The "$20 transaction fee" was an absolute top, and when that happened it was the single most congested the bitcoin network has ever been. It's nowhere near that right now. The total cost for your "median" transaction right now (at 226 bytes) is about $4.30 USD (at 150 sat/byte). Even if you double that to 300 sat/byte you are still at ~$9. Edit: I'm not saying even $4 fees are okay, just pointing out that it's not $2…

When did $4.30 transaction fees become even close to acceptable. I thought high TX fees was one of the things Bitcoin was purported to solve.

I'm not saying they are acceptable, i'm saying that $20 fees per average transaction isn't true in all cases except once in the history of bitcoin.

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but you could set transaction fee to 20 cents, it would just take much longer to get confirmed?

Kind of, if you set it too low it might never get confirmed at all, but for the most part you can set fees pretty damn low if you are willing to wait for confirmation.

Possibly much, much longer, but it could be returned in 14 days if it's too low and never makes it out of the mempool.

That's where traditional electronic payments have a huge edge -- instant, incredibly cheap guaranteed verification.

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#48
So one of the things I liked the idea of was micro payments - eg click to donate 5 cents to the author of an article. Are there any crypto currencies that work with negligible fees for micropayments? Is there a framework to use them?

Thanks

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#49
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The volatility alone wouldn't be a huge problem if the transactions were quick, apart from having to constantly re-price the goods (not a big deal with an automated system selling digital downloads, even though it is a real PITA for the accounting afterwards!). However, getting the transaction confirmed can take many hours at the times of high demand and then it still fails because thanks to the volatility, the trans…

> I think this is what will ultimately bring Bitcoin down People have been saying that for years. It serves purposes other than buying and selling goods, and in fact almost no one uses it to buy things.

What other purposes is it used for?

Re: Steam is no longer supporting Bitcoin

#50
post #27
post #10

$20 transaction fee. Bitcoin for small payments is dead.

Here's a recent transaction with a $2 fee: https://blockchain.info/tx/704b0c6c19c8cfe1d16093552d5196a8f... For that $2 a transaction is forever recorded on thousands of nodes in a worldwide consensus network, secured by a huge number of miners. Blockchains are not going to scale to visa level numbers of transactions without huge blocks and de facto centralization. The reasonable alternative is a second transaction la…

So a 20% transaction fee on a $10 transaction? Who pays that fee?
Post reply on HN