Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that's a quite common design. It might be forbidden if you expose that outside the device, but in electronics internal to the device you can do that no problem.
It sounds to me like the ground level is exposed outside the device in this case.
Reprogramming a $13 consumer wifi-enabled outlet
41–44 of 44 posts
Re: Reprogramming a $13 consumer wifi-enabled outlet
#42Re: Reprogramming a $13 consumer wifi-enabled outlet
#43I really enjoyed reading this, but it wasn't entirely clear to me what the author planned to reprogram the unit to actually do. So from my perspective, the article ended abruptly when the author declared success even though I was looking forward to a description of the conclusion. The story is important and often overlooked in these moments. It's what justifies spending a hundred hours and $200 to achieve something y…
If you read the entire article it's clear why he's reprogramming them. You have to fully read the first two paragraphs. But essentially, he reprograms the smart plugs to respond to a simple HTTP GET request to turn the lights on, and then turn the lights off after 11 seconds, and the 11 second countdown can be reset by hitting that HTTP endpoint again. He has a "sensor" board that has a light sensor, and when he turn…
Question: once you turn the lights on, how would you turn them off given that there's still light in the room?
Re: Reprogramming a $13 consumer wifi-enabled outlet
#44wifi seems overkill to send on off signals. i would use 433mzh
Given the ESP8266 brings a WiFi radio and 32bit microcontroller for < $2 on your BOM I think this sort of overkill is warranted. 433mhz provides no mechanism for link-layer security which seems irresponsible in this day and age.