Live data from Hacker News

Tether Critical Announcement

tether.to

41–50 of 327 posts

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#41
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tethers are not smart contracts. It's a separate crypto blockchain currency from Bitcoin and it claims to have a near 1:1 ratio with the USD, hence the name...it's "tethered" to the USD. This is not unlike some foreign currencies.

Touché. But the Omni Core Layer mentioned in the announcement implements them.

Omni layer wasn't hacked or exploited, this company just lost their private key

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#42
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep, you'd expect to eventually see a sustained divergence to price in an elevated level of counterparty risk (like we saw back at Mt. Gox). In the short run, though, arbitrage bots gonna arbitrage.

In the short run, though, arbitrage bots gonna arbitrage. Don't people who run arbitrage bots usually understand concepts like counterparty risk? Do they not realize that by moving money into Bitfinex they're potentially acquiring a large amount of assets which will end up being devalued?

It might be easier to commit money to an arbitrage bot than to understand the risks involved.

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#43
Tether is handling this completely wrong. They should not hard fork Omni and force everyone to blacklist addresses. Instead, tell everyone to halt on-chain trading, take a snapshot of the chain, then create a new tether token and send them to everyone holding the old tethers (minus the thief). I think the bitcoins Tether would have to pay in transfer fees would be a fitting punishment for their poor security.

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#44
post #27

Isn't tether the one that screwed up? They are the ones who got stolen from, why do other exchanges have to bend over backwards and issue updates? If the attacker is moving fast enough, exchanges probably can't even respond in time. That shouldn't mean that they lose money. If tether reserves the right to delist coins at any time without much notice, why would you ever consider that a safe asset to accept?

Situation seems analogous to DAO hack. It was DAO who got stolen, Ethereum was fine, no Ethereum software had to bend over backwards to follow hard fork. Still, it seems post-ETH/ETC-fork ETH is doing fine, and sometimes even considered a safe asset to accept.

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#45
post #27

Isn't tether the one that screwed up? They are the ones who got stolen from, why do other exchanges have to bend over backwards and issue updates? If the attacker is moving fast enough, exchanges probably can't even respond in time. That shouldn't mean that they lose money. If tether reserves the right to delist coins at any time without much notice, why would you ever consider that a safe asset to accept?

Because there are two kinds of crypto exchanges. Ones that have banking and can deal directly with government issued fiat currency and those that don't. If you don't have that banking then your pairs are all in USDT. If the Tether/USDT scheme goes to hell those exchanges w/o banking lose out to a degree so I think it is in all their interest to cooperate.

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#46
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it is "supposedly" backed up by USD. A whole bunch of people have been questioning whether they ACTUALLY have that money, very recently, and surprise surprise, there just 'happens' to be a hack that happens right now.

Not sure if "a whole bunch of people" equates more than 5 extremely vocal people on twitter and reddit. Tether published an audit a month ago.

And yet, here they are getting "hacked".

What an amazing coincidence!

It is almost as if people predicted literally this exact scenario.

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#47
post #4

If you haven't been following along, here's why this matters: Tethers is a sole-source cryptocurrency, pegged to the US dollar. Bitfinex produces it, though they're cagey (some would say outright lying at times) about the level of involvement. The primary purpose of tethers is money laundering, even more so than cryptocurrency generally. Bitfinex was cut off from the US financial system, which makes it impossible for…

This also illustrates the absurdity of so called "money laundering". Just moving money around between private parties is somehow a serious crime. Hint: It's not. Money laundering is just a cheat code for prosecutors to get easy points when they can't actually find real wrongdoing.

The funny part is that Tethers came into being after Bitfinex was hacked, right, as a way to help them out? Sometimes we say after someone or a company makes a mistake they're less likely to do so again. In this case, "oops"?

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#49
post #27

Isn't tether the one that screwed up? They are the ones who got stolen from, why do other exchanges have to bend over backwards and issue updates? If the attacker is moving fast enough, exchanges probably can't even respond in time. That shouldn't mean that they lose money. If tether reserves the right to delist coins at any time without much notice, why would you ever consider that a safe asset to accept?

Because Tether can set the rules since they run the system? Perhaps they will use this as an excuse to claim everyone is tainted and force another haircut?

Re: Tether Critical Announcement

#50

Tether is handling this completely wrong. They should not hard fork Omni and force everyone to blacklist addresses. Instead, tell everyone to halt on-chain trading, take a snapshot of the chain, then create a new tether token and send them to everyone holding the old tethers (minus the thief). I think the bitcoins Tether would have to pay in transfer fees would be a fitting punishment for their poor security.

You can't just keep hard forking even time something had happens. The problem is inherit to digital assets: they can be hacked.
Post reply on HN