Google forked Swift
41–50 of 78 posts
Re: Google forked Swift
#42Perhaps this is the start of moving Android Apps to Swift. Which, per rumor was considered last year: "About the time Swift was going open source, representatives for three major brands — Google, Facebook and Uber — were at a meeting in London discussing the new language. Sources tell The Next Web that Google is considering making Swift a “first class” language for Android" https://thenextweb.com/dd/2016/04/07/google…
maybe 'was'? kotlin is the official google's recommendation for android now... (and kotlin can have multiple 'backends' -- e.g. build-to-java / native / web / etc)
Re: Google forked Swift
#43Perhaps this is the start of moving Android Apps to Swift. Which, per rumor was considered last year: "About the time Swift was going open source, representatives for three major brands — Google, Facebook and Uber — were at a meeting in London discussing the new language. Sources tell The Next Web that Google is considering making Swift a “first class” language for Android" https://thenextweb.com/dd/2016/04/07/google…
Nothing more. They aren't related to or even located organizationally anywhere near Android.
Re: Google forked Swift
#44This is being used as a staging place for putting patches so they can be turned into pull requests, nothing more. Sorry to bust any conspiracy theories. (You can see this happens on >100 of the swift forks :P)
Re: Google forked Swift
#45This is being used as a staging place for putting patches so they can be turned into pull requests, nothing more. Sorry to bust any conspiracy theories. (You can see this happens on >100 of the swift forks :P)
Thanks for response. Just curious - seems you saw this and replied in about 20 minutes of the post. Impressive speed. I know about google alerts etc and hacker news is popular, but curious how exactly you found this post so quickly? Someone saw it and pinged you or some automatic way?
So basically either legal problems or go generics. It's a fun life.
Re: Google forked Swift
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank God. Otherwise this seemed like a very Microsoft/Java strategy.
I also worried having two different languages -- Google Swift and Apple Swift.
Re: Google forked Swift
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for response. Just curious - seems you saw this and replied in about 20 minutes of the post. Impressive speed. I know about google alerts etc and hacker news is popular, but curious how exactly you found this post so quickly? Someone saw it and pinged you or some automatic way?
People have a tendency to ping me either about languages or open source stuff, especially when it seems a bit off the rails. So basically either legal problems or go generics. It's a fun life.
Re: Google forked Swift
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
I also worried having two different languages -- Google Swift and Apple Swift.
Maybe you should have tried to find out what this is about before posting it with a completely made up title?
Don't see a problem.
Re: Google forked Swift
#49Hi! I’m one of the engineers on this. We’ve got some work we’re collaborating on - all of which is going upstream - and we wanted a shared place to stage it while we prepare PRs. I’ll be pushing a statement to our fork tomorrow. (I’m personally working on Bazel rules and contributions to lib/Syntax. If you find that exciting, please get in touch! :)
Re: Google forked Swift
#50Hi! I’m one of the engineers on this. We’ve got some work we’re collaborating on - all of which is going upstream - and we wanted a shared place to stage it while we prepare PRs. I’ll be pushing a statement to our fork tomorrow. (I’m personally working on Bazel rules and contributions to lib/Syntax. If you find that exciting, please get in touch! :)
Why fork it then? Why just not use the existing process?