Well, there is a link to a thread on a webhostingtalk.com, where some people are discussing the issue. After reading the original posting by the blog service provider and some of the replies, here are some basic lessons to be learned from this. 1. A lot of people have no clue as to the legal process 2. It pays REALLY well to have external backups 3. It might be a good idea to use encrypted volumes to store sensitive…
70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
41–50 of 71 posts
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#42A blogging service works on a per-account basis, for them to shut down the whole server instead of just taking down the offending account(s) seems to be pretty excessive, no matter what those accounts have 'done'. There is some chance they found themselves the unwitting participant in a child pornography distribution network, and that they don't know which accounts are 'the ones', and they've taken everything off-lin…
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#43Yeah! joshwa's got a point there! Law enforcement agents concerned with not publicly identifying themselves might also likely be concerned with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
And yet is continued by the current administration: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/us/politics/21obama.text.h... And Obama authorized the assassination of a US citizen; something even Bush never did: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.h...
The speech you point to does not support your point. My reading is that he is trying to cleaning up the toxic legal spill that the previous administration left behind (while trying not to give his Republic critics ammunition). Re. the assassination of a US citizen, that hardly seems notable given that the guy is very actively involved in putting together terrorist attacks. Surely any president would make the same dec…
1) Among all his rhetoric about not continuing the policy he slips in
"there may be a number of people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted, but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States...must be prevented from attacking us again "
His policy stays the same, he is just better at hiding it from the public.
2) Thats the same rhetoric people used to defend Bush. Innocent till proven guilty in a court of Law I say.
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
And yet is continued by the current administration: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/us/politics/21obama.text.h... And Obama authorized the assassination of a US citizen; something even Bush never did: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.h...
If possible, it's generally better to link to someplace other than the You Must Be A Registered Member Times. A signup form is not very informative.
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#46I am skeptical - The host, https://www.burst.net/ Looks like a template monster design with a reseller system, no traffic rank and a nearly empty forum- From a outsider looking in, it looks like a host that is barely in business and likely ran by one guy from his apartment. Maybe they are over-exaggerating for press? Maybe the server crashed, and they dont want the bad press so did a bogus excuse? Stranger things hav…
"The company has experienced exceptional growth and currently hosts 5000+ dedicated servers and co-located machines, 5000+ Virtual Private Servers (VPS), and millions of websites."
If it's one guy running it from his apartment, that's gotta be one amazing apartment.
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
derwiki replied to this comment by saying: "The gag order was ruled unconstitutional as an infringement of free speech, in the Doe v. Ashcroft case." (same article) For some reason, his reply is dead, but it seems like a valuable comment so I'm reproducing it.
Thank god for the separation of powers. It is incredible how many rights the Bush presidency attempted to take away from its citizens all in the name of national security. The more I read stuff like this the more it seems that we were heading to a totalitarian government. Edit: In case anybody wonders why I threw in Bush's name in there is because the Patriot Act, created during his presidency, greatly extended the N…
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
The speech you point to does not support your point. My reading is that he is trying to cleaning up the toxic legal spill that the previous administration left behind (while trying not to give his Republic critics ammunition). Re. the assassination of a US citizen, that hardly seems notable given that the guy is very actively involved in putting together terrorist attacks. Surely any president would make the same dec…
It seems the origigonal post was deleted I guess... Now it seems I'm like I'm talking to myself. 1) Among all his rhetoric about not continuing the policy he slips in "there may be a number of people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted, but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States...must be prevented from attacking us again " His policy sta…
Now, finally, there remains the question of detainees at Guantanamo who cannot be prosecuted yet who pose a clear danger to the American people. And I have to be honest here -- this is the toughest single issue that we will face. We're going to exhaust every avenue that we have to prosecute those at Guantanamo who pose a danger to our country. But even when this process is complete, there may be a number of people who cannot be prosecuted for past crimes, in some cases because evidence may be tainted, but who nonetheless pose a threat to the security of the United States. Examples of that threat include people who've received extensive explosives training at al Qaeda training camps, or commanded Taliban troops in battle, or expressed their allegiance to Osama bin Laden, or otherwise made it clear that they want to kill Americans. These are people who, in effect, remain at war with the United States.
The ease/danger of a transition from a democracy to a totalitarian regime was something of which the Founders were aware. Our freedoms are protected precisely by a Constitutional framework which provides safeguards, like habeas corpus. President Obama is a Constitutional scholar, and acknowledges our bindings to it. Compare that with Bush who was rumored to say it's "just a piece of paper". There may be case by case issues which are difficult as well as debatable for any president to decide, but altering the legal framework in ways which diminish civil liberties and protections is dangerous, and can too easily lead a public that is not paying attention to a place they realize too late they don't want to be.
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thank god for the separation of powers. It is incredible how many rights the Bush presidency attempted to take away from its citizens all in the name of national security. The more I read stuff like this the more it seems that we were heading to a totalitarian government. Edit: In case anybody wonders why I threw in Bush's name in there is because the Patriot Act, created during his presidency, greatly extended the N…
Yes and even more incredible that Obama has done nothing at all to change it.
Re: 70,000 Blogs Shut Down by U.S. Law Enforcement
#50I am thinking that the subject might be child pornography, espionage or cyber terrorism. Should some of those blogs had some sort of method of communicating information with terrorists I do not see why the NSA would not shut the whole thing down. I hate to be in the shoes of those 70000 people but from the article and evidence available right now this is a really serious matter.
maybe the fbi thinks terrorists were communicating via blog comments, in a secret code designed to look like spam? as far as 'movie-plot terrorism' goes, i don't think it's too far fetched.